Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions
Published on: April 20, 2016
Measurements error propagation and its sensitivity analysis in the aero-engine multistage rotor assembling process.
Maowei Zhang1, Yongmeng Liu1, Chuanzhi Sun1
1Center of Ultra-Precision Optoelectronic Instrument Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150080, China.
This study introduces a new method to analyze measurement errors in aero engine rotor assembly equipment. Linear guide alignment and verticality errors are key issues impacting precision, requiring improvements for better accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Mechanical Engineering
- Aerospace Engineering
- Metrology
Background:
- Accurate measurement and assembly are critical for aero engine multistage rotors.
- Existing methods may not fully capture error propagation in complex measurement equipment.
- Understanding error sources is vital for enhancing assembly precision.
Purpose of the Study:
- To research the principle of measurement error propagation in aero engine multistage rotor measurement-assembly equipment.
- To analyze the influence of linear and rotational motion on final alignment errors.
- To improve the measurement and assembly accuracy of aero engine multistage rotors.
Main Methods:
- Established measurement equipment topology using multibody system theory.
- Constructed error propagation paths via low-order body sorting.
- Developed error transfer models for linear and rotational motion using homogeneous coordinate transformation matrices.
- Calculated total measurement terminal errors and performed numerical simulations.
- Conducted sensitivity analysis to identify key error sources.
Main Results:
- Quantified measurement terminal offset errors through numerical simulation.
- Demonstrated that linearity and angular errors significantly impact cumulative offset displacement.
- Identified linear guide alignment error and verticality error as primary error sources.
- Simulation showed a 97% probability of a -0.1002 μm to -0.0998 μm cumulative offset displacement error with 0.1 μm linearity and 0.1″ angular errors.
Conclusions:
- Measurement accuracy is dependent on both sensor accuracy and measurement-assembly equipment precision.
- Linear guide alignment and verticality errors are the most significant contributors to final alignment errors.
- Improvements in the angular accuracy of the turntable are necessary to enhance overall measurement and assembly accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Node Analysis for AC Circuits
To unravel the complexities of this system, nodal analysis is employed, a powerful technique founded on Kirchhoff's current law (KCL), which remains valid for phasors. AC circuits can effectively be...
Transmission Shafts: Problem Solving
Next, use bending moment diagrams for the shaft to...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Design of Transmission Shafts - Stress Analysis
Residual Stresses in Circular Shafts

