Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Clinical predictors of pocket hematoma after cardiac device implantation and replacement
Sonia Ferretto1,2, Giulia Mattesi1, Federico Migliore1
1Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua.
Insights
Low ejection fraction and certain antithrombotic therapies increase pocket hematoma risk after cardiac device procedures. Avoid low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and dual antiplatelet therapy in these patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Pocket hematoma is a frequent complication following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures.
- Optimizing perioperative antithrombotic management is crucial for patient safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify clinical factors associated with pocket hematoma formation after CIED implantation or replacement.
- To determine the optimal perioperative antithrombotic strategy to minimize hematoma risk.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 500 consecutive patients undergoing CIED implantation or replacement.
- Evaluation of patient data including antithrombotic therapy, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and procedure type.
- Multivariate analysis to identify predictors of pocket hematoma.
Main Results:
- The overall incidence of pocket hematoma was 4.6% after implantation and 4.4% after replacement.
- Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) use was associated with a significantly higher hematoma rate (11.0%).
- Predictors of pocket hematoma included dual antiplatelet therapy (OR 6.3), LVEF < 30% (OR 7.4), and LMWH use (OR 3.8).
Conclusions:
- Low LVEF and the use of LMWH are significant risk factors for pocket hematoma post-CIED procedures.
- Combination therapy of anticoagulants with dual antiplatelet agents and LMWH should be avoided to reduce hematoma incidence.
Aims:
Pocket hematoma is a common complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures. the aim of the study was to research the clinical factors associated with pocket hematoma formation after CIED implantation or replacement and to identify the best perioperative antithrombotic management.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 500 consecutive patients who underwent to CIED implantation or replacement at our center from November 2014.
Results:
Among our population, 206 patients (41.2%) were on anticoagulant therapy at the time of the intervention: 68 (13.6%) on ongoing Warfarin; 111 (22.2%) on low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH); and 27 (5.4%) on ongoing direct oral anticoagulants. Antiplatelet therapy was present in 262 (52.4%) patients: in particular, 50 (10%) were on dual antiplatelet therapy, 64 (12.8%) were on single antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulant therapy, whereas 12 (2.4%) were on anticoagulant with dual antiplatelet therapy.Incidence of pocket hematoma after CIEDs implantation was of 4.6%. Considering the different perioperative anticoagulant strategies, patients on LMWH presented the higher hematoma rate [11/100 patients (11.0%), P < 0.001]. At the multivariate analysis, anticoagulant with dual antiplatelet therapy (P = 0.021, OR 6.3, IC 1.3-30.8), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 30% (P < 0.001, OR 7.4, IC 2.7-20.4), and use of LMWH (P = 0.008, OR 3.8, IC 1.4-10.6) resulted the strongest predictors of pocket hematoma (Hosmer test = 0.899).Considering replacement procedures, incidence of pocket hematoma was of 4.4%. The incidence was higher after ICD/CRT-D replacement. The majority of pocket hematoma occurred in patients with mechanical valve prosthesis (3/4 cases, 75%, P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
The use of LMWH and a low LVEF expose patients to a higher risk of pocket hematoma after CIED procedures. Anticoagulant with dual antiplatelet therapy and LMWH should be avoided.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

