Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Macerated Tissue to Visualize the Extracellular Matrix
Published on: June 14, 2016
Ventricular late potentials and myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Ayumi Matsuki1, Tatsuya Kawasaki2, Hirofumi Kawamata2
1Department of Cardiology, Matsushita Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Insights
Ventricular late potentials (VLPs) are not reliable for detecting myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a more accurate method for assessing fibrosis in this population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Ventricular late potentials (VLPs) reflect delayed cardiac conduction, often linked to myocardial fibrosis.
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a condition characterized by myocardial fibrosis and electrical abnormalities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) findings, specifically VLPs, and myocardial fibrosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in HCM patients.
Main Methods:
- The study included 41 HCM patients in sinus rhythm who underwent SAECG (measuring VLPs, filtered QRS duration, low amplitude signal duration [LAS], and root mean square voltage [RMS]) and CMR.
- Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) utilized late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) to assess myocardial fibrosis.
- The concordance rate between VLP detection and LGE findings was analyzed.
Main Results:
- Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was detected in 13 patients, and VLPs in 14. SAECG parameters (filtered QRS duration, LAS, RMS, VLPs) did not correlate with LGE.
- Concordance between LGE and VLPs was observed in 26 patients, with 15 showing discordance.
- Discordant patients exhibited greater maximum wall thickness, higher LGE volume, and predominant LGE in the interventricular septum and anterior wall compared to concordant patients.
Conclusions:
- Ventricular late potentials (VLPs) are not a dependable marker for identifying myocardial fibrosis in HCM patients when assessed by LGE on CMR.
- SAECG, including VLPs, is not a substitute for CMR in the evaluation of myocardial fibrosis in HCM.
Aims:
Ventricular late potentials (VLPs) represent delayed conduction due in part to myocardial fibrosis. We sought to examine the relationship of signal-averaged electrocardiography findings with myocardial fibrosis as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
Methods:
This study consisted of 41 HCM patients with sinus rhythm who had undergone risk assessment including CMR and signal-averaged electrocardiography such as VLPs, filtered QRS duration, low amplitude signal duration of the terminal filtered QRS below 40 μV (LAS), and root mean square voltage of the late 40 ms of the filtered QRS (RMS). The concordance rate between VLPs and myocardial fibrosis as assessed by CMR was examined.
Results:
Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMR was detected in 13 patients, and VLPs were detected in 14. Filtered QRS duration, LAS, RMS, and VLPs were not associated with LGE. The results of LGE and VLPs were concordant in 26 patients, whereas 15 exhibited discordance. Patients with discordance had a higher maximum wall thickness (24.1 ± 4.0 mm versus 21.0 ± 5.9 mm, p < 0.05), higher LGE volume (2.3 ± 1.2 g/cm versus 0.0 ± 0.8 g/cm, p < 0.01), lower LGE volume/the total number of sites with LGE (1.5 ± 0.7 versus 3.1 ± 2.8, p < 0.01), and predominant LGE location of the interventricular septum and anterior wall (60% versus 8%, p < 0.01) than patients with concordance.
Conclusion:
VLPs were not a reliable marker for the detection of myocardial fibrosis as assessed by LGE on CMR in our cohort of patients with HCM.
Condensed Abstract:
Ventricular late potentials on signal-averaged electrocardiography represent delayed conduction due in part to myocardial fibrosis but were not an alternative to cardiac magnetic resonance for detecting myocardial fibrosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
More Related Videos
14:39Isolation and Functional Characterization of Human Ventricular Cardiomyocytes from Fresh Surgical Samples
Published on: April 21, 2014
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy