Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Gene Digital Circuits Based on CRISPR-Cas Systems and Anti-CRISPR Proteins
Published on: October 18, 2022
Gene activation by dCas9-CBP and the SAM system differ in target preference.
Suresh Sajwan1, Mattias Mannervik2
1Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, 10691, Stockholm, Sweden. suresh.sajwan@su.se.
Comparing two gene overexpression systems, dCas9-CBP and the Synergistic Activation Mediator (SAM), reveals distinct efficiencies in Drosophila cells. This comparison aids in understanding transcription mechanisms and improving genome-wide screening for gene function discovery.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Epigenetics
Background:
- Catalytically defective Cas9 (dCas9) fused with transcription activation domains enables targeted gene overexpression for functional studies.
- The Synergistic Activation Mediator (SAM) system is a highly efficient dCas9-based activator, utilizing MS2 loops for recruitment.
- Understanding gene control mechanisms requires precise tools for modulating gene expression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the gene activation efficiency of a novel dCas9-CBP fusion protein against the established SAM system in Drosophila.
- To investigate the differential effects of these activators on transcription at various genomic loci.
- To explore the utility of these dCas9-based activators for mechanistic studies of transcription and genome-wide overexpression screens.
Main Methods:
- Utilized catalytically defective Cas9 (dCas9) fused to the catalytic domain of histone acetyltransferase CBP.
- Employed the Synergistic Activation Mediator (SAM) system as a benchmark for comparison.
- Performed gene overexpression experiments in Drosophila cells to assess activator potency at different loci.
Main Results:
- The dCas9-CBP system demonstrated greater activation potency than the SAM system at certain genomic locations in Drosophila.
- Conversely, the SAM system exhibited higher efficiency at other tested loci.
- The distinct performance suggests that dCas9-CBP and SAM impact different rate-limiting steps in the transcription cycle.
Conclusions:
- dCas9-CBP and SAM represent distinct tools for gene activation, offering complementary approaches for transcriptional modulation.
- Comparing these activators provides insights into the mechanistic intricacies of gene transcription.
- The differential efficiencies enhance the potential for optimizing genome-wide overexpression screens to identify novel gene functions.
More Related Videos
13:47Lentiviral Vector Platform for the Efficient Delivery of Epigenome-editing Tools into Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Disease Models
Published on: March 29, 2019
10:28Repressing Gene Transcription by Redirecting Cellular Machinery with Chemical Epigenetic Modifiers
Published on: September 20, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators
Co-activators and Co-repressors
Cis-regulatory Sequences
Cis-regulatory Sequences
Master Transcription Regulators
Cell Specific Gene Expression