Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 2, 2026
05:54
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
2.2K
Retention systems used in maxillofacial prostheses: A review
A A Diken Türksayar1, S A Saglam1, A C Bulut1
1Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kirikkale, Kirikkale, Turkey.
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
|December 4, 2019
Summary
Facial prostheses improve appearance after defects, but retention is key. Modern adhesives and implants significantly enhance the stability and patient acceptance of these crucial facial restorations.
Area of Science:
- Maxillofacial prosthetics
- Biomaterials science
- Dental implantology
Background:
- Facial defects from trauma, tumors, or congenital conditions necessitate specialized facial prostheses.
- Prosthesis retention is a primary challenge, impacting function and patient satisfaction beyond esthetics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review historical and current methods for facial prosthesis retention.
- To evaluate the advantages of adhesives and implants as leading retention techniques.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive literature review of retention methods for facial prostheses.
- Analysis of current techniques, materials, and treatment options for adhesive and implant-supported prostheses.
Main Results:
- Adhesives and implants are the most common and effective current methods for prosthesis retention.
- Advancements in adhesive materials and implant technology are continuously improving prosthesis success rates.
Conclusions:
- Improved retention of maxillofacial prostheses enhances patient usability and acceptance.
- The selection of an appropriate retention method is critical for the long-term success and prognosis of facial prostheses.
