Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Microparticle Manipulation by Standing Surface Acoustic Waves with Dual-frequency Excitations
Published on: August 21, 2018
Compensating for source directivity in immersive wave experimentation
Xun Li1, Johan Robertsson1, Andrew Curtis2
1Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zurich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract:
A physical boundary mounted with active sources can cancel acoustic waves arriving at the boundary, and emit synthesized waves into the neighboring medium to fully control the acoustic wavefield in an experimental setup such as a water tank or air-filled cavity. Using the same principles, a physical experiment can be artificially immersed within an extended virtual (numerical) domain so that waves propagate seamlessly between the experimental setup and virtual domain. Such an immersive wave control experiment requires physical monopolar sources on the active boundary. However, real physical sources (e.g., piezoelectric transducers) project waves at middle-to-high sonic frequencies (e.g., 1-20 kHz) that do not fully conform to the theoretically required monopolar radiation pattern; if left uncorrected, this causes controlled wavefields to deviate from those desired in immersive experiments. A method is proposed to compensate for the non-monopole-like radiation patterns of the sources, and can be interpreted physically in terms of Huygens principle. The method is implemented as a pre-computation procedure that modifies the extrapolation Green's functions in the Kirchhoff-Helmholtz integral before the actual experiments take place. Two-dimensional finite-difference simulations show that the processing method can effectively suppress the undesired effect caused by non-monopolar active sources in immersive wave control experiments.
Related Concept Videos
Sound Waves: Interference
Echo
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
Interference: Path Lengths
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Propagation of Waves
Consider a scenario where a wave propagates from a string of low linear mass density to a string of high linear mass density. In such a case, the reflected wave is out of phase with respect to the incident wave, however the...
Interference and Superposition of Waves
Interference occurs in mechanical waves, such as sound waves, waves on a string, and surface water waves. Mechanical waves correspond to the physical displacement of particles. Hence,...
Standing Waves in a Cavity

