Investigation of garbage code deaths to improve the quality of cause-of-death in Brazil: results from a pilot study

Raquel Barbosa de Lima1, Ashley Frederes2, Maria Fatima Marinho3

  • 1Coordenação Geral de Informações e Análise Epidemiológica, Departamento de Análise de Saúde e Vigilância de Doenças Não Transmissíveis, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Ministério da Saúde. Brasília (DF) - Brazil.

Insights

A pilot study in Brazil successfully investigated garbage codes (GC) in cause of death (CoD) data, improving data reliability. This strategy enhanced CoD certification for over 92% of investigated deaths.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Mortality Statistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Reliable cause-of-death (CoD) statistics are crucial for understanding population health trends.
  • Brazil's Mortality Information System faces challenges with 'garbage codes' (GCs) that are not valid underlying causes of death.
  • The Ministry of Health (MoH) aims to reduce the proportion of GCs in mortality data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test a comprehensive strategy for investigating garbage code (GC) deaths in Brazil.
  • To improve the accuracy of cause of death (CoD) certification by addressing GCs.

Main Methods:

  • A pilot study was conducted in seven Brazilian cities involving municipal healthcare workers.
  • Information on terminal diseases was collected from hospital records, autopsies, family health teams, and home investigations.
  • Fieldwork was coordinated federally in partnership with state and municipal teams.

Main Results:

  • Physicians analyzed data from 1,242 selected GC deaths.
  • The underlying cause of death was successfully changed to a usable ICD-10 code in 1,055 cases (92.6%).

Conclusions:

  • Health teams demonstrated significant capacity during the pilot implementation.
  • The GC investigation protocol was refined and scaled up to 60 cities in 2017 based on pilot results.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.2K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
814
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
610
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
848
Principles of Disease Surveillance01:26

Principles of Disease Surveillance

Disease surveillance is the systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of health data essential to the planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health practice. This process integrates data dissemination to entities responsible for preventing and controlling disease, injury, and disability. Surveillance systems provide crucial information for action, helping public health authorities make informed decisions to manage and prevent outbreaks, ensure public safety, optimize...
423
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
263