Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Structure and Coordination Determination of Peptide-metal Complexes Using 1D and 2D 1H NMR
Published on: December 16, 2013
Coordination bonding in dicopper and dichromium tetrakis(μ-acetato)-diaqua complexes: Nature, strength, length, and
Michal Malček1, Barbora Vénosová1, Ingrid Puškárová1
1Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Institute of Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Radlinského 9, SK-812 37, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Abstract:
Geometry optimization, energetics, electronic structure, and topology of electron density of dicopper (I) and dichromium (II) tetrakis(μ-acetato)-diaqua complexes are studied focusing on the metal-metal interactions. The performance of broken symmetry (BS) single-determinant ab initio (Hartree-Fock, Møller-Plesset perturbation theory to the second and third orders, coupled clusters singles and doubles) and density functional theory (BLYP, B3LYP, B3LYP-D3, B2PLYP, MPW2PLYP) methods is compared to multideterminant ab initio (CASSCF, NEVPT2) methods as well as to the multipole model of charge density from a single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiment (Herich et al., Acta Cryst. 2018, B74, 681-692). In vacuo DFT geometry optimizations (improper axial water ligand orientation) are compared against the periodic ones. The singlet state is found to be energetically preferred. J coupling of (I) becomes underestimated for all ab initio methods used, when compared to experiment. It is concluded that the strength of the direct M─M interactions correlates closely with the J coupling magnitude at a given level of theory. The double potential well character of (II) and of the dehydrated form of (II) are considered with respect to the Cr─Cr distance. The physical effective bond order of the metal-metal interaction is small (below 0.1 e) in (I) and moderate (0.4 e) in (II). The CASSCF results overestimate the electron density of the metal-metal bond critical point by 20% and 50% in (I) and (II), respectively, when compared to the multipole model. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coordination Number and Geometry
Valence Bond Theory
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Coordination Compounds and Nomenclature
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...

