Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.4K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.4K
Thermodynamic Potentials01:26

Thermodynamic Potentials

1.5K
Thermodynamic potentials are state functions that are extremely useful in analyzing a thermodynamic system. They have dimensions of energy. The four important thermodynamic potentials are internal energy, enthalpy, Helmholtz free energy, and Gibbs free energy. These thermodynamic potentials can be expressed using two of the following variables: pressure, volume, temperature, and entropy. These two variables are expressed as the rate of change of the thermodynamic potential with respect to other...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.4K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.4K
Non-conservative Forces01:17

Non-conservative Forces

9.2K
Non-conservative forces are dissipative forces such as friction or air resistance. These forces take energy away from a system as it progresses. Unlike conservative forces, non-conservative forces do not have potential energy associated with them. This is because the energy is lost to the system and cannot be turned into useful work later.
Also unlike their conservative counterparts, they are path-dependent; where the object starts and stops does matter. For example, a grinding wheel applies a...
9.2K
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling01:27

¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling

2.5K
The coupling interactions of nuclei across four or more bonds are usually weak, with J values less than 1 Hz. While these are usually not observed in spectra, the presence of multiple bonds along the coupling pathway can result in observable long-range coupling.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
2.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.5K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Scaling laws and paradoxical metastable states in nanofilament entropic separation.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

A Pedagogical Reinforcement of the Ideal (Hard Sphere) Gas Using a Lattice Model: From Quantized Volume to Mechanical Equilibrium.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Surface Excess Energy as a Unifying Thermodynamic Framework for Active Diffusion.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same author

Entropy Production in a System of Janus Particles.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Nanoscale nonlocal thermal transport and thermal field emission in high-current resonant tunnel structures.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Lattice Models in Molecular Thermodynamics: Merging the Configurational and Translational Entropies.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Cooling an Optically Trapped Ultracold Fermi Gas by Periodical Driving
11:21

Cooling an Optically Trapped Ultracold Fermi Gas by Periodical Driving

Published on: March 30, 2017

7.8K

Negative Thermophoretic Force in the Strong Coupling Regime.

Rodrigo de Miguel1, J Miguel Rubí2,3

  • 1Department of Teacher Education, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway.

Physical Review Letters
|December 7, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Negative thermophoresis, where particles move towards colder areas, is explained by a new thermodynamic model. This framework captures the counterintuitive phenomenon using a Hamiltonian of mean force, offering a straightforward description.

More Related Videos

DNA Tension Probes to Map the Transient Piconewton Receptor Forces by Immune Cells
06:53

DNA Tension Probes to Map the Transient Piconewton Receptor Forces by Immune Cells

Published on: March 20, 2021

3.1K
High-Speed Magnetic Tweezers for Nanomechanical Measurements on Force-Sensitive Elements
08:50

High-Speed Magnetic Tweezers for Nanomechanical Measurements on Force-Sensitive Elements

Published on: May 12, 2023

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Cooling an Optically Trapped Ultracold Fermi Gas by Periodical Driving
11:21

Cooling an Optically Trapped Ultracold Fermi Gas by Periodical Driving

Published on: March 30, 2017

7.8K
DNA Tension Probes to Map the Transient Piconewton Receptor Forces by Immune Cells
06:53

DNA Tension Probes to Map the Transient Piconewton Receptor Forces by Immune Cells

Published on: March 20, 2021

3.1K
High-Speed Magnetic Tweezers for Nanomechanical Measurements on Force-Sensitive Elements
08:50

High-Speed Magnetic Tweezers for Nanomechanical Measurements on Force-Sensitive Elements

Published on: May 12, 2023

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Thermodynamics
  • Statistical Mechanics
  • Physical Chemistry

Background:

  • Negative thermophoresis, particle movement against temperature gradients, lacks a simple statistical explanation.
  • Understanding thermophoresis is crucial for controlling particle behavior in various systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a thermodynamic framework capable of describing negative thermophoresis.
  • To elucidate the mechanism behind thermophoretic forces acting from cold to hot.

Main Methods:

  • Formulation of a thermodynamic framework using a Hamiltonian of mean force.
  • Analysis of systems strongly coupled to a nonisothermal heat bath.
  • Investigating temperature-dependent eigenenergies and energy exchange.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework successfully captures negative thermophoresis.
  • A mechanism is described where systems exchange heat for work, influencing energy profiles.
  • Temperature-dependent energy levels lead to nonmonotonic effective energy profiles.

Conclusions:

  • The Hamiltonian of mean force provides an elegant and straightforward description of negative thermophoresis.
  • Strong coupling to heat baths enables systems to manipulate energy exchange, driving thermophoretic forces.
  • Particle movement direction in thermophoresis can be controlled by temperature-dependent effects.