Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Minimally invasive interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Gynecologic oncology·2023
Same author

Hit or MISs: Surgical Approaches to the Big Three in Gynecologic Oncology.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2021
Same author

Connect the Dots-March 2021.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2021
Same author

A Tribute to Nancy C. Chescheir, MD.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2020
Same author

Too Good to Be True.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2020
Same author

Chemotherapy-free, but not quite free chemotherapy.

The Lancet. Oncology·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Techniques of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Modified Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Mice
10:05

Techniques of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Modified Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Mice

Published on: March 20, 2017

12.5K

Minimally Invasive Surgery in Morbidly Obese Women.

John O Schorge1

  • 1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Obstetrics and Gynecology
|December 7, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery offers benefits, especially for obese patients facing higher complication risks. This article provides essential tips for successfully performing these complex procedures in high-risk individuals.

More Related Videos

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

715
Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
05:37

Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

Published on: August 6, 2019

6.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Techniques of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Modified Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Mice
10:05

Techniques of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Modified Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Mice

Published on: March 20, 2017

12.5K
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

715
Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
05:37

Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

Published on: August 6, 2019

6.7K

Area of Science:

  • Gynecologic Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) presents clinical advantages over traditional open laparotomy.
  • MIGS techniques have evolved significantly over 25 years, enhancing their applicability.
  • Rising obesity rates correlate with increased surgical complications like infections and wound issues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the benefits of MIGS for obese patients.
  • To address the increased surgical complexity associated with obesity in MIGS.
  • To offer practical strategies for successful MIGS in high-risk patient populations.

Main Methods:

  • Review of clinical advantages and innovations in MIGS.
  • Analysis of complication risks in obese patients undergoing gynecologic surgery.
  • Discussion of challenges and techniques for safe MIGS completion.

Main Results:

  • Obese patients stand to gain the most from MIGS due to higher complication risks with open surgery.
  • Increased patient obesity proportionally increases surgical complexity and demands meticulous technique.
  • Non-surgical interventions are becoming more common, increasing the likelihood of complex MIGS cases.

Conclusions:

  • MIGS is crucial for managing gynecologic conditions in obese patients.
  • Careful technique and attention to detail are paramount for safe and successful MIGS in complex cases.
  • This article provides guidance to improve outcomes for patients requiring MIGS, particularly those with obesity.