Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
An observational study found large methodological heterogeneity in systematic reviews addressing prevalence and
Falk Hoffmann1, Daniela Eggers2, Dawid Pieper3
1School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Objectives:
The objective of this study was to assess reporting and methodological aspects of systematic reviews (SRs) on prevalence and cumulative incidence data.
Study Design And Setting:
We searched PubMed up to 18 April, 2018, and drew a random sample of eligible SRs.
Results:
The included 215 SRs were reported in 187 different journals. 58.1% were published between 2015 and 2018. Few SRs were registered with PROSPERO (5.6%). One-quarter considered articles without languages restrictions (25.1%). Regional restrictions of included studies were applied in 22.8%. A meta-analysis was carried out in 40.5% of the SRs. One hundred and six studies (49.3%) assessed risk of bias or study quality. A total of 41 different existing tools as well as 15 tools developed by the authors themselves were used. The most commonly applied tools were the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (15.1%), STROBE (13.5%), and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias (7.9%).
Conclusion:
We found large heterogeneity in characteristics, reporting, and methodological aspects of SRs on prevalence and cumulative incidence data, especially when compared with other types of SRs. Newly developed or revised guidance on how to conduct and report SRs as well as instruments for critical appraisal should consider the diversity of review types.
Related Concept Videos
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
