Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 2, 2026

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
Published on: August 4, 2020
C3-C5 Chordoma Resection and Reconstruction with a Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium Patient-Specific Implant
William C H Parr1, Joshua L Burnard2, Telvinderjit Singh2
1Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group, Sydney, Australia; 3DMorphic Pty Ltd., Sydney, Australia.
Background:
With this case report, we aim to add to the clinical literature on the use of three-dimensional printed patient-specific implants in spinal surgery, show the current state of the art in patient-specific implant device design, present thorough clinical and radiographic outcomes, and discuss the suitability of titanium alloy as an implant material for patients with cancer.
Case Description:
A 45-year-old man presented with neck and left arm pain combined with shoulder weakness. Imaging revealed significant destruction of the C3-C5 vertebrae, and chordoma diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy. Gross total tumor resection including multilevel corpectomy was performed in combination with reconstruction using a three-dimensional printed titanium custom implant. Custom-designed features aimed to reduce reconstruction time and result in good clinical and radiographic outcomes. Clinical scores improved postoperatively and remained improved at 17-month postoperative follow-up: visual analog scale score 10/10 preoperatively improved to 2-6/10 at 17 months; Neck Disability Index 46% preoperatively improved to 32% at 17 months. Neither dysphagia nor dysphonia remained after surgical soft tissue swelling subsided. The patient was successfully treated with proton beam therapy after surgery, with no tumor recurrence at 17-month follow-up. Radiographic assessment showed incomplete fusion at 3 months, with clinically insignificant implant subsidence (2.7 mm) and no implant migration or failure at 14 months.
Conclusions:
Computer-aided preoperative planning with three-dimensional printed biomodels and custom implant resulted in relatively quick and simple reconstruction after tumor resection, with good clinical and radiographic outcomes at 17 and 14 months, respectively. For patients with primary tumors who may require follow-up radiotherapy or postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, metals used in the devices cause significant imaging artifact.

