Growth response to growth hormone therapy following cranial irradiation

P E Clayton1, S M Shalet, D A Price

  • 1Department of Child Health, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Pendelbury, UK.

Insights

Growth hormone (GH) therapy improved growth velocity in children with cranial irradiation (C-PRGHD) and idiopathic GH deficiency (IGHD). While C-PRGHD patients achieved acceptable final height, they did not show height SDS catch-up like IGHD patients.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Endocrinology
  • Pediatric Oncology
  • Growth Hormone Therapy

Background:

  • Cranial irradiation can affect growth in children, particularly those with brain tumors or receiving CNS leukemia prophylaxis.
  • Growth hormone (GH) deficiency is a known complication impacting linear growth.
  • Understanding the response to GH therapy in cranially irradiated children is crucial for optimizing growth outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the growth response to GH therapy in children with cranial irradiation (C-PRGHD) versus those with isolated idiopathic GH deficiency (IGHD).
  • To evaluate the efficacy of GH therapy in achieving final height in these two distinct pediatric populations.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study comparing 12 cranially irradiated children (C-PRGHD) with 14 children with isolated idiopathic GH deficiency (IGHD) undergoing GH therapy.
  • Analysis of growth parameters including standing height, sitting height, leg length, bone age (BA) retardation, and growth velocity (cm/year and SDS for BA).
  • Comparison of pre-treatment characteristics and response to GH therapy over time, including pubertal onset and final height attainment.

Main Results:

  • C-PRGHD patients had better baseline height SDS and less bone age retardation than IGHD patients.
  • Both groups showed significant increases in growth velocity during the first two years of GH treatment.
  • C-PRGHD patients entered puberty earlier, completing growth sooner, resulting in no change in height SDS compared to catch-up growth observed in IGHD patients.

Conclusions:

  • GH therapy significantly enhances growth velocity in both C-PRGHD and IGHD children.
  • While GH therapy helps C-PRGHD patients maintain their centile and achieve acceptable final height, it does not lead to the same degree of height catch-up seen in IGHD patients.
  • Early puberty onset in C-PRGHD patients limits the potential for significant height SDS improvement despite GH treatment.

Related Concept Videos