On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure

Area of Science:

• Computer Science
• Scientific Computing
• Software Engineering

Background:

• Research software quality evaluation remains a significant challenge within the scientific community.
• Existing methods for assessing research software are insufficient to meet current scientific demands.
• The need for standardized evaluation protocols for research software is increasingly recognized.

Purpose of the Study:

• To define research software and its authors comprehensively.
• To identify and analyze the key issues in research software evaluation.
• To propose a robust assessment protocol for research software.

Main Methods:

• The study defines research software and its authors.
• It analyzes existing evaluation challenges.
• It introduces the CDUR (Citation, Dissemination, Use, Research) procedure for assessment.

Main Results:

• The CDUR procedure offers a structured approach to evaluating research software.
• CDUR includes four key components: Citation, Dissemination, Use, and Research impact.
• This protocol facilitates the identification, dissemination, usability, and impact assessment of research software.

Conclusions:

• Research software evaluation is fundamental for advancing Open Science policies and practices.
• Implementing the CDUR procedure can lead to improved research software development and practices.
• Better research software practices contribute to more efficient and impactful scientific research.