Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Personalized Medicine in Ovarian Cancer
Published on: February 23, 2024
Clinical Decision Support for Ovarian Carcinoma Subtype Classification: A Pilot Observer Study With Pathology
Marios A Gavrielides1, Meghan Miller1, Ian S Hagemann1
1From the Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Office of Engineering and Science Laboratories (Dr Gavrielides and Ms Miller), and the Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health, Division of Molecular Genetics and Pathology (Dr Seidman), Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland; the Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park (Ms Miller); and the Departments of Pathology and Immunology (Drs Hagemann, Abdelal, Alipour, Chen, Salari, Sun, and Zhou) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr Hagemann), Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. Ms Miller is currently with PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Columbia, Maryland.
Clinical decision support (CDS) tools can help less experienced pathologists improve diagnostic accuracy for complex cases like ovarian carcinoma. This study shows CDS systems have the potential to bridge knowledge gaps in pathology diagnostics.
Area of Science:
- Digital Pathology
- Oncology
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- Clinical decision support (CDS) systems can aid pathologists with complex diagnostic tasks.
- The impact of CDS on pathologist performance for specialized tasks remains underexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a CDS tool in assisting pathology trainees with ovarian carcinoma subtype classification.
- To assess the impact of CDS on diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement using digital pathology.
Main Methods:
- Six pathology residents reviewed 90 whole slide images of ovarian carcinoma.
- Review was conducted both unaided and aided by a CDS tool identifying key histologic features.
- Performance was compared against a consensus reference standard from expert gynecologic pathologists.
Main Results:
- Aided review improved pairwise concordance with the reference standard for 5 of 6 observers (3.3%–17.8% increase).
- Mean interobserver agreement increased by 9.2% with CDS assistance.
- Observers benefited most from CDS prompts for previously missed, subtype-definitive histologic features.
Conclusions:
- Clinical decision support systems show potential for closing knowledge gaps in complex pathology diagnostics.
- CDS tools can enhance diagnostic accuracy and consistency for less experienced pathologists.
More Related Videos
12:42Heterotypic Three-dimensional In Vitro Modeling of Stromal-Epithelial Interactions During Ovarian Cancer Initiation and Progression
Published on: August 28, 2012
09:59Application of AlDeSense to Stratify Ovarian Cancer Cells Based on Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A1 Activity
Published on: March 31, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Epithelial Tissues: Overview
Based on the number of cell layers,...
Classification of Epithelial Tissues: Stratified Epithelium