Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

Therapeutic Index

Therapeutic Index

The therapeutic index of a drug is a key parameter in pharmacology that quantifies the relative safety of a drug by calculating the ratio between the dose that causes toxicity in half the population (50%) to the dose that proves to be effective for half the population (50%). It provides a spectrum of doses for a particular drug ranging from effective to potentially toxic. To illustrate, consider an anticoagulant agent like warfarin. It possesses a narrow window within its therapeutic index to...

Relative Risk

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...

Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

Diagnosing acute coronary syndrome or ACS begins with a thorough patient history. Notable symptoms include central, crushing chest pain radiating to the left arm, neck, jaw, or back, along with shortness of breath, sweating (diaphoresis), nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and palpitations.It is crucial to note any history of cardiac illnesses and assess risk factors, including age, gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and a sedentary lifestyle.During physical examination, vital...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Trends in acute myocardial infarction-related mortality among adults with type 1 vs. type 2 diabetes in the United States, 1999-2020.

Frontiers in endocrinology·2026

Same author

Left Atrial Appendage Closure Lacks Sufficient Evidence for Routine Use.

Thrombosis and haemostasis·2026

Same author

The Reply.

The American journal of medicine·2026

Same author

Continuous vs interrupted direct oral anticoagulants for minimal bleeding-risk surgical procedures-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis·2026

Same author

Trial emulation of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion versus direct oral anticoagulants.

Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing·2026

Same author

Safety of catheter ablation compared with antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Heart rhythm·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles

Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles

Published on: July 26, 2024

Fragility Index in Cardiovascular Randomized Controlled Trials.

Muhammad Shahzeb Khan¹, Rohan Kumar Ochani², Asim Shaikh²

¹Department of Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL (M.S.K., N.Y.).

Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

|December 12, 2019

Summary

The fragility index (FI) assesses the robustness of cardiovascular randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Many trials show low FI, indicating results may not be robust, especially when patient follow-up is incomplete.

Keywords:

bias cardiovascular system fragility index heart failure sample size

More Related Videos

Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model

Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model

Published on: September 23, 2025

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty

Published on: July 24, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles

Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles

Published on: July 26, 2024

Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model

Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model

Published on: September 23, 2025

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty

Published on: July 24, 2013

Area of Science:

Clinical Trials
Cardiovascular Medicine
Biostatistics

Background:

Traditional measures like P values and effect sizes are not always intuitive for clinicians.
The fragility index (FI) offers a more interpretable metric for binary outcomes.
FI quantifies the minimum patient number shift needed to negate a statistically significant finding.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the robustness of cardiovascular randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using the fragility index (FI).
To assess the reliability of statistically significant primary outcomes in cardiovascular research.

Main Methods:

Retrospective analysis of cardiovascular RCTs published between 2007-2017 in six high-impact journals.
Inclusion criteria: sample size >500, factorial or dichotomous primary outcomes.
Calculation of FI for each selected trial.

Main Results:

Median FI was 13 among 123 included RCTs.
22.8% of trials had an FI of 1-4, and 30.1% had more patients lost to follow-up than their FI.
Pharmaceutical interventions (median FI=19) and multiregional RCTs (median FI=22) showed higher FI.
FI varied significantly by subspecialty (P=0.020).

Conclusions:

Significant variation in FI exists across cardiovascular trials.
Results emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of trial outcomes.
Particular attention is warranted when the number of patients lost to follow-up surpasses the trial's FI.