[A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO POTASSIUM CITRATE REGIMENS FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEPHROLITHIASIS]

UROCIT-K is a potassium-citrate regimen prescribed for the prevention of kidney stone formation. In 2013, K-CITEK was introduced to the local market as a new potassium-citrate regimen that reduces kidney stone formation in a declared rate of 93.

We sought to explore the efficacy of K-CITEK versus UROCIT-K.

A prospective database of patients treated with potassium-citrate regimens for nephrolithiasis has been reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who were treated with UROCIT-K only (Group 1) and those who were treated with K-CITEK only (Group 2). The two groups were compared as regards to demographics, length of follow-up, urinary citrate level and stone burden changes, as well as the number of stone events (i.e: colic, surgery) throughout the follow-up period. In a separate analysis another group (Group 3) was checked. This group consisted of patients who were initially treated with UROCIT-K and later on were switched to K-CITEK.

The study group consisted of 104 patients: 54 patients in Group 1, 38 in group 2 and 12 in group 3. The latter was omitted from analysis due to the small size. Groups 1 and 2 resembled in their demographic data and medical comorbidities. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of change in urinary citrate levels, stone burden or recurrent stone events.

K-CITEK for the treatment of kidney stone prevention was found to be as equally effective as UROCIT-K in terms of increasing urinary citrate levels, reducing stone burden and maintaining the intervals between kidney stone events.