Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

1.7K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
1.7K
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

494
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
494
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

238
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
238

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The online processing of dynamics.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Relational dynamics inform predictive motor planning and perception.

Journal of neurophysiology·2025
Same author

Sensorimotor adaptation reveals systematic biases in 3D perception.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Sensory feedback modulates Weber's law of both perception and action.

Journal of vision·2024
Same author

Embeddedness of Earth's gravity in visual perception.

Journal of vision·2024
Same author

Ouvrai opens access to remote virtual reality studies of human behavioural neuroscience.

Nature human behaviour·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

5.8K

Depth cue reweighting requires altered correlations with haptic feedback.

Evan Cesanek1, Fulvio Domini1

  • 1Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, & Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Journal of Vision
|December 12, 2019
PubMed
Summary

This study shows how haptic feedback during grasping influences depth cue reweighting. Learning alters motor responses by adjusting sensitivity to visual cues like stereo and texture based on feedback correlations.

More Related Videos

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

16.5K
Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

5.8K
The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

16.5K
Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Perception
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • Depth cue reweighting modifies how the brain uses 3D shape information.
  • Previous research explored cue reweighting for perception, but its motor learning time course and mechanisms were unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate the mechanism of stereo and texture cue reweighting using haptic feedback during grasping.
  • Document the time course of cue reweighting within a single training session.
  • Determine the specific feedback signals driving reweighting.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments manipulated haptic feedback during grasping movements.
  • Objects were physically grasped, with feedback consistent with either stereo or texture cues.
  • Measured changes in grip aperture as a motor response.

Main Results:

  • Found short-term motor response changes indicating cue reweighting.
  • Grip aperture slope increased with reliable cues and decreased with unreliable cues.
  • Constant cue bias prevented slope changes, suggesting a different adaptation mechanism.

Conclusions:

  • Cue reweighting is driven by altered correlations between haptic feedback and specific visual cues.
  • Findings support a model where learning modifies cue weighting based on feedback reliability.
  • Distinguishes cue reweighting from simpler sensorimotor adaptation or recalibration mechanisms.