Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.3K
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

5.0K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
5.0K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

363
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
363
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

64.4K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
64.4K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

301
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
301
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

63.6K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
63.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What holds groups together? How interdependence shapes group-living.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Two models of mind blanking.

The European journal of neuroscience·2023
Same author

Animal thought exceeds language-of-thought.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023
Same author

Is that all there is? Or is chimpanzees group hunt "fair" enough?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2020
Same author

Linking perception and cognition.

Frontiers in psychology·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.6K

Temporal representation and reasoning in non-human animals.

Angelica Kaufmann1, Arnon Cahen1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 5290002, Israel. angelica.kaufmann@gmail.comacahen@wustl.eduhttps://biu.academia.edu/AngelicaKaufmann.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|December 13, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Non-human animals, specifically Sumatran orangutans, demonstrate the ability to reason about time through their complex vocalizations. This challenges previous assumptions in developmental psychology about cognitive limitations in animals.

More Related Videos

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

12.0K
Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals
08:28

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals

Published on: November 6, 2016

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.6K
A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

12.0K
Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals
08:28

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals

Published on: November 6, 2016

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Comparative Psychology
  • Ethology
  • Animal Cognition

Background:

  • Previous research in comparative and developmental psychology posits that animals and infants lack the capacity for temporal reasoning.
  • This view suggests a fundamental limitation in non-human cognition regarding time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the assertion that animals cannot reason about time.
  • To highlight ethological evidence supporting temporal representation in non-human animals.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of long travel calls in Sumatran orangutans.
  • Examination of ethological data on animal communication and behavior.

Main Results:

  • Evidence suggests Sumatran orangutans' vocalizations indicate a capacity for temporal representation.
  • This challenges established theories in developmental psychology.

Conclusions:

  • Ethological findings provide critical counter-evidence to claims of animal cognitive limitations regarding time.
  • Non-human animals possess a more sophisticated understanding of time than previously acknowledged.