Comparison of different methods for the estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic

Sophia Houriez-Gombaud-Saintonge1,2,3, Elie Mousseaux4, Ioannis Bargiotas5

  • 1Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale (LIB), 75006, Paris, France.

Insights

Four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D flow CMR) can accurately estimate aortic stiffness. This method shows strong associations with established measures and is reproducible, offering a valuable tool for assessing cardiovascular health.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Physics

Background:

  • Arterial pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a key indicator of cardiovascular aging and disease, linked to increased mortality.
  • Carotid-femoral PWV (Cf-PWV) and 2D cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) are established methods for assessing aortic stiffness.
  • 4D flow CMR offers a comprehensive approach to evaluating aortic stiffness through various estimation methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare different aortic PWV (aoPWV) estimation methods using 4D flow CMR.
  • To assess the association of 4D flow CMR aoPWV with age, Cf-PWV, Bramwell-Hill PWV (BH-PWV), and left ventricular (LV) mass-to-volume ratio.
  • To evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility and robustness to temporal resolution of 4D flow CMR aoPWV methods.

Main Methods:

  • 47 healthy subjects underwent Cf-PWV and CMR, including 4D flow and 2D cine SSFP.
  • Aortic segmentation and mean velocity waveforms were derived from 4D flow data.
  • aoPWV was calculated using 2D-like (S1) and 3D-like (S2, S3) strategies with different transit time (TT) calculations (cross-correlation, wavelets, Fourier transforms).

Main Results:

  • 4D flow CMR aoPWV estimates significantly correlated with Cf-PWV, BH-PWV, age, and LV mass-to-volume ratio (all p < 0.05).
  • The 3D-like strategy using wavelets TT (S2-TTw) showed the strongest correlations (e.g., R=0.77 for age).
  • S2-TTw demonstrated high inter-observer reproducibility (ICC=0.99) and robustness to lower temporal resolution (ICC=0.97).

Conclusions:

  • Reproducible aoPWV measurements can be obtained from 4D flow CMR using full 3D aortic coverage.
  • 4D flow CMR-derived stiffness measures are significantly associated with established clinical parameters.
  • The 3D strategy with wavelets transit time (S2-TTw) shows particular promise for clinical application.
Abstract