Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures may optimize shared decision-making for cancer risk management in BRCA mutation
L S E van Egdom1, M A de Kock1, I Apon2
1Department of Surgical Oncology, RG-228, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, P.O. 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BRCA1/2 mutation carriers undergoing surveillance reported better physical well-being than those with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM). Both groups showed no anxiety or depression, with surveillance outcomes exceeding normative data.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- BRCA1/2 mutations significantly increase breast cancer risk.
- Risk management strategies include surveillance or bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM).
- Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are crucial for informed decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- Compare PROs between BRCA1/2 carriers undergoing BPM with immediate breast reconstruction (BPM-IBR) versus surveillance.
- Inform shared decision-making for cancer risk management in this population.
Main Methods:
- 96 unaffected BRCA1/2 carriers were analyzed: one group post-BPM-IBR, the other under surveillance.
- Participants completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and BREAST-Q.
- PROs were compared between groups and with normative data.
Main Results:
- No participants reported anxiety or depression (HADS scores < 8).
- The surveillance group reported significantly higher 'Q-physical well-being' scores than the BPM-IBR group (p=0.011).
- Both groups reported better outcomes than age-matched normative data.
Conclusions:
- BPM-IBR and surveillance are associated with good mental health in BRCA1/2 carriers.
- Surveillance offers superior physical well-being compared to BPM-IBR.
- Longitudinal PRO data and reference values are needed to enhance shared decision-making for breast cancer risk management.
More Related Videos
13:04In Vivo and Ex Vivo Approaches to Study Ovarian Cancer Metastatic Colonization of Milky Spot Structures in Peritoneal Adipose
Published on: October 14, 2015
08:15gDNA Enrichment by a Transposase-based Technology for NGS Analysis of the Whole Sequence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and 9 Genes Involved in DNA Damage Repair
Published on: October 6, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...