A Robust Estimator of Malaria Incidence from Routine Health Facility Data
Julie Thwing1, Alioune Camara2, Baltazar Candrinho3
1Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
|December 14, 2019
Summary
Routine malaria surveillance data in sub-Saharan Africa are often inaccurate due to inconsistent testing and reporting. This study introduces a formula to correct these biases, providing a more accurate picture of malaria burden and unmet needs for tests and treatments.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Infectious Disease Surveillance
Background:
- Routine malaria case data are crucial for surveillance in sub-Saharan Africa.
- Crude incidence data are susceptible to biases from care-seeking, testing, and reporting variations.
- Accurate malaria burden estimation is vital for effective control strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a method for correcting routine malaria incidence data for biases.
- To provide a more accurate estimation of malaria burden across sub-Saharan Africa.
- To quantify the unmet need for malaria diagnostics and treatments.
Main Methods:
- Derived a simple algebraic formula to adjust crude malaria incidence rates.
- Applied the correction formula to data from Guinea, Mozambique, and the World Malaria Report.
- Calculated continent-wide needs for malaria tests and treatments based on corrected incidence and current care-seeking rates.
Main Results:
- Corrected incidence maps showed better alignment with community survey prevalence than crude data.
- Estimated unmet need for malaria tests: 160 million (IQR: 139-188 million).
- Estimated unmet need for malaria treatments: 37 million (IQR: 29-51 million).
Conclusions:
- Crude malaria incidence data require careful interpretation due to suboptimal testing and care-seeking.
- The developed correction method offers improved insight into spatiotemporal malaria trends.
- Accurate malaria burden assessment is essential for addressing significant unmet needs in diagnostics and treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
847
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
847
Kaplan-Meier Approach
516
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
516
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
446
In the ever-evolving field of public health, statistical analysis serves as a cornerstone for understanding and managing disease outbreaks. By leveraging various statistical tools, health professionals can predict potential outbreaks, analyze ongoing situations, and devise effective responses to mitigate impact. For that to happen, there are a few possible stages of the analysis:
446
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
8.7K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.7K


