Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Cardiac Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis Using Conductance Catheters in Mice
Published on: September 17, 2015
Comparative Effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus ACE/ARB Therapy in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection
Nicholas Y Tan1, Lindsey R Sangaralingham2, S Jeson Sangaralingham1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Insights
Sacubitril-valsartan use in systolic heart failure (HF) patients showed reduced risks of death and hospitalization compared to ACE/ARB. However, similar outcomes were observed in Black patients, warranting further investigation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- The PARADIGM-HF trial demonstrated sacubitril-valsartan's superiority over enalapril in reducing mortality and HF hospitalizations.
- Real-world comparative effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan versus ACE/ARB in systolic heart failure (HF) remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan against angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) in patients with systolic HF in a real-world setting.
- To evaluate risks of mortality and hospitalization associated with sacubitril-valsartan versus ACE/ARB treatments.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a U.S. administrative claims database to identify patients with systolic HF treated between July 2015 and February 2018.
- Employed one-to-one propensity score matching on 29 clinical variables to create balanced cohorts for sacubitril-valsartan and ACE/ARB users.
- Applied Cox models to compare all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and HF hospitalization between the two treatment groups.
Main Results:
- Analysis included 7,893 matched pairs with a mean follow-up of 6.3 months.
- Sacubitril-valsartan was associated with significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.80) and all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.86) compared to ACE/ARB.
- No significant difference in HF hospitalization was observed (HR: 1.07), and a reduced risk of the primary outcome was noted in White patients but not in Black patients (interaction p=0.032).
Conclusions:
- Sacubitril-valsartan demonstrated reduced risks of death and hospitalization in a diverse systolic HF patient cohort compared to ACE/ARB.
- The similar outcomes observed between sacubitril-valsartan and ACE/ARB in Black patients necessitate further research and evaluation.
- Findings suggest potential differential treatment effects based on race, highlighting the need for personalized approaches in HF management.
Objectives:
This paper aims to compare the effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in systolic heart failure (HF).
Background:
Sacubitril-valsartan reduced risks of death and hospitalization for HF versus enalapril in ambulatory patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction in the PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Neprilysin Inhibitor with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in HF) trial. However, the comparative effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan and ACE/ARB in patients treated in routine clinical practice is unclear.
Methods:
We identified patients with systolic HF in a U.S. administrative claims database treated with sacubitril-valsartan or ACE/ARB from July 1, 2015, to February 2, 2018. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to balance patients on 29 clinical variables. Cox models were used to compare outcomes between treatment groups.
Results:
A total of 7,893 matched pairs were included; mean (SD) follow-up was 6.3 (5.4) months. Sacubitril-valsartan was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81 to 0.91; p < 0.001), all-cause mortality (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.97; p = 0.027), and all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.91; p < 0.001), but not HF hospitalization (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.19; p = 0.26). A lower risk of the primary outcome with sacubitril-valsartan was observed in white patients (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.90) but not black patients (21% of population, HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.15; interaction p = 0.032). No statistically significant differences in treatment response by sex or age were observed.
Conclusions:
Sacubitril-valsartan was associated with lower risks of death and hospitalization compared with ACE/ARB in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with systolic HF. However, our finding that outcomes with sacubitril-valsartan and ACE/ARBs were similar in black patients warrants further evaluation.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
07:24Reduction in Left Ventricular Wall Stress and Improvement in Function in Failing Hearts using Algisyl-LVR
Published on: April 8, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics