Treatment selection for patients with equivocal HER2 status and in luminal versus HER2-enriched disease

Equivocal HER2 status has been variably defined in the past, and its clinical implications have long been debated. In the 2018 focused update, ASCO/CAP guidelines recommended that tumours with double-equivocal (by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization assays) HER2 status should be considered HER2-negative due to the lack of evidence for any benefit of HER2-targeted therapy. The biology and the response to systemic therapies of tumours co-expressing HR and HER2 is quite complex. There is an extensive bi-directional cross-talk between these 2 pathways, that may result in both intrinsic and acquired resistance to endocrine agents, as well as in lower sensitivity to HER2-targeted therapies. In fact, neoadjuvant studies indicate that pCR rates are significantly lower in HER2-positive/ER-positive than ER-negative tumours, regardless the type of HER2 targeted treatment. The recent identification of different subtypes of HER2-positive breast cancer, according to the co-expression of HR and/or the molecular (intrinsic) subtyping, has prompted a renewed interest for clinical studies aimed at better tailoring the systemic therapy for these patients. A subgroup of them might not need chemotherapy if treated with dual HER2 blockade, and this option has been tested in a number of neo-adjuvant trials. In addition, triple targeting of HR, HER2, and CDK4/6 pathways simultaneously may be an effective treatment and overcome the drug resistance mechanisms that are typical of the disease. Finally, HER2-positive breast cancer may well benefit from immunotherapeutic interventions with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents.