Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Terminating life-sustaining treatment--recent US developments.

R D Mackay1

  • 1Dickinson School of Law, Pennsylvania.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|September 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary

Recent US court decisions favor patient autonomy in withdrawing food and hydration. However, disputes between healthcare providers and patients regarding life-sustaining treatment termination persist, with courts likely remaining final arbiters.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An anatomy of automatism.

Medicine, science, and the law·2015
Same author

Are psychiatrists affecting the legal process by answering legal questions?

Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH·2008
Same author

AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial: an English legal perspective.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2007
Same author

Brain atrophy in HIV infection is more strongly associated with CDC clinical stage than with cognitive impairment.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·1997
Same author

The taint of intoxication.

International journal of law and psychiatry·1990
Same author

Dangerous patients. Third party safety and psychiatrists' duties--walking the Tarasoff tightrope.

Medicine, science, and the law·1990

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics and Law
  • Bioethics
  • Healthcare Policy

Background:

  • Litigation concerning the withdrawal of food and hydration from patients.
  • Competent and incompetent patient rights in end-of-life care.
  • Tensions between healthcare providers and patients regarding life-sustaining treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent US litigation on withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration.
  • To analyze judicial trends regarding patient autonomy and end-of-life decisions.
  • To explore the ongoing conflict between healthcare facilities and patients' end-of-life wishes.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent court decisions in the United States.
  • Analysis of legal arguments and judicial reasoning in patient autonomy cases.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachDeath and EuthanasiaLegal ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of disputes over termination of life-sustaining treatment.

    • Main Results:

    • A discernible trend favoring patient autonomy in decisions to withdraw food and hydration.
    • Persistent underlying tensions between medical professionals, healthcare facilities, and dying patients.
    • Court decisions highlight the complexity and lack of easy resolution in these cases.

    Conclusions:

    • US courts are likely to continue serving as the ultimate decision-makers in life-sustaining treatment termination disputes.
    • The legal landscape reflects an ongoing societal debate on balancing patient rights with medical practice.
    • Further legal and ethical considerations are necessary to address these complex end-of-life care conflicts.