Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biological processes and moral events.

S Buckle1

  • 1Monash University, Australia.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|September 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Post-transplant conversion from cyclosporin to azathioprine: effect on cardiovascular risk profile.

Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation·1993
Same author

Case-control study of leukaemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among children aged 0-4 years living in west Berkshire and north Hampshire health districts.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1993
Same author

Cardiovascular risk impact of cyclosporine immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients.

Transplantation proceedings·1992
Same author

Response to Oderberg.

Journal of medical ethics·1990
Same author

Screening for genetic disorders: therapeutic abortion and IVF.

Journal of medical ethics·1990
Same author

Psychosocial predictors of survival in end-stage renal disease.

The Journal of nervous and mental disease·1990
Same journal

Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Arguments claiming continuous embryo development prevents moral boundaries are flawed. This paper challenges these claims, arguing that identifying morally significant events in development is not impossible or arbitrary, and highlights the true ethical challenges.

Area of Science:

  • Embryology
  • Bioethics
  • Developmental Biology

Background:

  • The continuity of embryonic development is often cited to argue against establishing morally significant boundaries.
  • Existing arguments suggest that defining such boundaries requires identifying specific developmental events, which are deemed arbitrary or impossible.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate arguments that the continuous nature of embryo development precludes morally significant boundaries.
  • To demonstrate that the continuity argument is not logically sound.
  • To identify the actual ethical challenges in defining moral status during development.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of arguments concerning developmental continuity.
  • Ethical reasoning applied to developmental milestones.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and ReproductionWarnock Committee

Related Experiment Videos

  • Critique of existing bioethical frameworks on embryo status.

    • Main Results:

    • Arguments based on developmental continuity are found to be unconvincing.
    • The identification of morally significant events in embryo development is not inherently arbitrary or impossible.
    • The focus on continuity distracts from more substantive ethical considerations.

    Conclusions:

    • The continuity of embryonic development does not inherently prevent the establishment of morally significant boundaries.
    • The real ethical challenges lie in defining criteria for moral status, not in the seamlessness of development.
    • Further ethical inquiry should focus on the nature of moral significance rather than developmental processes alone.