Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Out-Of-Network Billing And Negotiated Payments For Hospital-Based Physicians
Zack Cooper1, Hao Nguyen2, Nathan Shekita3
1Zack Cooper ( zack. cooper@yale. edu ) is an associate professor of health policy in the School of Public Health and of economics in the Department of Economics, both at Yale University, in New Haven, Connecticut.
Insights
Out-of-network billing by specialists in hospitals exposes patients to surprise medical bills and inflates healthcare costs. Eliminating this practice could significantly reduce physician payments and overall healthcare spending for employer-sponsored insurance plans.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Healthcare Policy
- Patient Financial Risk
Background:
- Physicians not chosen by patients can bill out-of-network for in-network hospital care, creating financial risks.
- This practice undermines the functioning of healthcare markets and patient cost predictability.
- Specialists may leverage out-of-network billing to negotiate higher in-network rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the prevalence of out-of-network billing by specific specialists within in-network hospitals.
- To identify factors associated with higher rates of out-of-network billing.
- To estimate the financial impact of eliminating out-of-network billing on physician payments and healthcare spending.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 2015 claims data from a large commercial insurer.
- Examination of out-of-network billing rates for anesthesiology, pathology, radiology, and assistant surgery.
- Regression analysis to identify correlates of out-of-network billing and estimate financial impacts.
Main Results:
- 11.8% of anesthesiology, 12.3% of pathology, 5.6% of radiology, and 11.3% of assistant surgeon services were billed out-of-network at in-network hospitals.
- Out-of-network billing was more common in concentrated hospital/insurance markets and at for-profit hospitals.
- Eliminating out-of-network billing could reduce physician payments by 13.4% and overall healthcare spending by 3.4% ($40 billion annually).
Conclusions:
- Out-of-network billing by certain specialists is prevalent within in-network facilities, posing financial risks to patients.
- Market concentration and hospital ownership influence the extent of this practice.
- Policy interventions to curb out-of-network billing could yield substantial savings in healthcare expenditures.
Abstract:
When physicians whom patients do not choose and cannot avoid can bill out of network for care delivered within in-network hospitals, it exposes patients to financial risk and undercuts the functioning of health care markets. Using data for 2015 from a large commercial insurer, we found that at in-network hospitals, 11.8 percent of anesthesiology care, 12.3 percent of care involving a pathologist, 5.6 percent of claims for radiologists, and 11.3 percent of cases involving an assistant surgeon were billed out of network. The ability to bill out of network allows these specialists to negotiate artificially high in-network rates. Out-of-network billing is more prevalent at hospitals in concentrated hospital and insurance markets and at for-profit hospitals. Our estimates show that if these specialists were not able to bill out of network, it would lower physician payments for privately insured patients by 13.4 percent and reduce health care spending for people with employer-sponsored insurance by 3.4 percent (approximately $40 billion annually).
Related Concept Videos
Hospitals-I
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I

