Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Pilon Fractures in Patients Older Than 60 Years of Age: Should We Be Fixing These?
Justin M Haller1, Michael Githens2, David Rothberg1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; and.
Insights
Elderly patients (≥60 years) undergoing surgical repair for pilon fractures show similar complication rates to younger patients. Age is not an independent predictor of treatment failure in these cases.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Trauma Surgery
- Geriatric Orthopedics
Background:
- Pilon fractures, also known as tibial plafond fractures, are complex injuries requiring surgical intervention.
- Outcomes in elderly patients undergoing operative treatment for pilon fractures are not well-established compared to younger populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of complications following operative treatment of pilon fractures between elderly (≥60 years) and younger (<60 years) patient groups.
- To determine if advanced age is an independent risk factor for surgical treatment failure in pilon fractures.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective comparative study of 538 patients with tibial plafond fractures (OTA/AO 43-B & 43-C) treated with open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF).
- Patients were divided into two groups: elderly (≥60 years) and younger (<60 years).
- Treatment failure was defined as nonunion or arthrosis. Statistical analyses included chi-square and regression analyses.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in treatment failure (43% vs. 37%), infection (10% vs. 13%), or malunion (3% vs. 4%) were observed between elderly and younger patients.
- Age >60 was not found to be an independent predictor of treatment failure (OR 1.2).
- Factors significantly associated with treatment failure included bone loss, open fracture, and malreduction.
Conclusions:
- Surgical treatment failure, defined as nonunion or arthrosis, is not independently predicted by age over 60 in patients with pilon fractures.
- Elderly patients can be treated similarly to younger patients using open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) for pilon fractures.
- This study represents the largest cohort investigating pilon fractures in elderly patients, supporting continued similar treatment approaches.
Objectives:
To compare complications after operatively treated pilon fracture between elderly patients (≥60 years) and younger patients (<60 years).
Design:
Retrospective comparative study.
Setting:
Two Level-1 academic trauma.
Patients/Participants:
Of the 740 tibial plafond fractures (OTA/AO 43-B & 43-C) treated January 2006 through December 2016, 538 patients had a minimum of 1 year follow up.
Intervention:
Open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF).
Main Outcome Measurement:
Treatment failure defined as either nonunion or arthrosis.
Results:
A total of 72 patients comprised the elderly group (mean age 66 years) and 466 patients comprised the younger group (mean age 44 years) (P < 0.001). Besides significantly more tobacco use in the younger group, patient demographics and fracture characteristics did not differ. Locking plates were used significantly more in elderly patients (47% vs. 32%, P = 0.01). Using chi-square analysis, we were unable to detect a difference in treatment failure (elderly 43% vs. young 37%, P = 0.33), infection (elderly 10% vs. young 13%, P = 0.4), or malunion (elderly 3% vs. young 4%, P = 1.0). Using regression analysis, age >60 was not associated with treatment failure [odds ratio (OR) 1.2 (0.7-2.1), P = 0.52]. Bone loss (OR 2.7 [1.8-4.1], P < 0.001), open fracture (OR 1.6 [1-2.5], P = 0.03), and malreduction (OR 4.2 [2.5-7.3], P < 0.001) were associated with failure.
Conclusions:
Age >60 years is not an independent predictor of surgical treatment failure of pilon fractures as defined by nonunion or arthrosis. This is the largest cohort of pilon fracture in elderly patients and indicates that we should continue to treat elderly patients similar to their younger counterparts using ORIF.
Level Of Evidence:
Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
More Related Videos
04:41Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
12:25C-arm-Free Simultaneous OLIF51 and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in a Single Lateral Position
Published on: September 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care