Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.1K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.1K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.0K
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

224
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
224
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

3.6K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.6K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.8K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

16.5K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
16.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thrombopoietin-Receptor Agonists in Chemotherapy-Induced Thrombocytopenia.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same author

Principles Supporting CKD Management in Primary Care: 2025 Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN·2026
Same author

2025 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline for the Primary Care Management of Chronic Kidney Disease.

Annals of internal medicine·2025
Same author

Advance directives prior to COVID-19 diagnosis in a United States national healthcare system.

PloS one·2025
Same author

When genotype and phenotype disagree: rethinking thrombophilia testing in the genomic era.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2025
Same author

Molecular clues to venous thromboembolism recurrence.

Blood·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 1, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.6K

A novel approach to the program evaluation committee.

Amy R Schwartz1,2, Mark D Siegel3, Alfred Ian Lee3

  • 1Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. amy.schwartz2@va.gov.

BMC Medical Education
|December 18, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A novel Program Evaluation Committee (PEC) design fostered resident leadership and yielded actionable feedback for internal medicine residency programs. This approach improved quality improvement and mentorship experiences for residents and faculty.

Keywords:
American council of graduate medical educationMedical education – graduateMedical education – qualitative methodsProgram evaluation

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

952
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 1, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.6K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

952
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Graduate Medical Education
  • Internal Medicine Residency

Background:

  • Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education mandates Program Evaluation Committees (PECs) for residency programs.
  • Current guidelines lack specificity regarding PEC design.
  • There is a need for PEC models that enhance resident leadership and provide actionable feedback.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a novel Program Evaluation Committee (PEC) model.
  • To promote resident leadership within the PEC framework.
  • To generate actionable feedback for residency program improvement.

Main Methods:

  • A 4-year implementation of a structured PEC process in an Internal Medicine residency program.
  • Resident and faculty participation in facilitated group discussions for rotation feedback.
  • PEC co-facilitators summarized feedback and collaborated with faculty and leadership to develop action plans.
  • Surveys assessed faculty and PEC member perceptions of the PEC process's utility and experience.

Main Results:

  • Common themes identified across rotations, highlighting strengths in teaching and patient care, and areas for improvement in curricula, inter-service collaboration, technology, and workflow.
  • PEC members reported rewarding mentorship, quality improvement, and facilitation skill development.
  • Faculty Firm Chiefs were more responsive to PEC feedback than traditional evaluations, though preferred receiving both.

Conclusions:

  • The PEC model successfully transformed feedback delivery by integrating residents into the process.
  • The initiative provided mentored quality improvement and leadership opportunities for residents.
  • The PEC process generated actionable feedback, leading to program-wide changes and evaluation of additional educational aspects.