Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment as a Useful Adjunctive Tool for Pneumonia
Published on: May 6, 2014
Adding positive airway pressure to mobilisation and respiratory techniques hastens pleural drainage: a randomised
Elinaldo da Conceição Dos Santos1, Juliana de Souza da Silva2, Marcus Titus Trindade de Assis Filho2
1Master and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Biological and Health Sciences, Universidade Federal do Amapá, Brazil.
Questions:
In patients with a collection of fluid in the pleural space, do mobilisation and respiratory techniques: shorten the drainage period and length of hospital stay; improve respiratory function and oxygenation; and prevent pulmonary complications? Does the addition of positive airway pressure to this regimen further improve the effects?
Design:
Randomised controlled trial with three intervention arms, concealed allocation, intention-to-treat analysis and blinded assessment.
Participants:
One hundred and fifty-six inpatients with a fluid collection in the pleural space and with chest drainage in situ.
Intervention:
Participants received usual care and were randomly assigned to: a control group that also received sham positive airway pressure (4 cmH2O) only (Con); an experimental group that received incentive spirometry, airway clearance, mobilisation and the same sham positive pressure (Exp1); or an experimental group that received the Exp1 regimen except that the positive airway pressure was 15 cmH2O (Exp2). Treatments were provided three times per day for 7 days.
Outcome Measures:
Days of chest tube drainage, length of hospital stay, pulmonary complications and adverse events were recorded until hospital discharge. Costs in each group were estimated.
Results:
The Exp2 group had shorter duration of chest tube drainage and length of hospital stay compared with the Exp1 and Con groups. In addition, the Exp2 group had less antibiotic use (18% versus 43% versus 55%) and pneumonia incidence (0% versus 16% versus 20%) compared with the Exp1 and Con groups (all p < 0.01). The groups had similar rates of adverse events (10% versus 2% versus 6%, p > 0.05). Total treatment costs were lower in the Exp2 group than in the Exp1 and Con groups.
Conclusions:
In patients with a fluid collection in the pleural space, the addition of positive pressure to mobilisation and respiratory techniques decreased the duration of thoracic drainage, length of hospital stay, pulmonary complications, antibiotic use and treatment costs.
Registration:
ClinicalTrials.govNCT02246946.
Related Concept Videos
01:24Chest Physiotherapy
Purpose
CPT is primarily used for patients with excessive bronchial secretions who have difficulty clearing...
01:22Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
01:23Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
01:30Pneumonia V: Nursing management and Prevention
The nurse must practice strict medical asepsis and adhere to infection control guidelines to minimize healthcare-associated infections.
Enhance airway patency
Position the patient correctly to facilitate drainage of the affected lung segments. Manual or mechanical percussion and vibration can also be employed....
01:29Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
01:27Pneumothorax-II
Clinical Manifestations: