Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Assessing the Risk for Development of Deep Vein Thrombosis among Chinese Patients using the 2010 Caprini Risk
Haixin Bo1, Yilin Li1, Ge Liu1
1Department of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences - Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital.
Aim:
We sought to validate the 2010 Caprini risk assessment model (RAM) in risk stratification for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis among Chinese bedridden patients.
Methods:
We performed a prospective study in 25 hospitals in China over 9 months. Patients were risk-stratified using the 2010 Caprini RAM.
Results:
We included a total 24,524 patients. Fresh DVT was found in 221 patients, with overall incidence of DVT 0.9%. We found a correlation of DVT incidence with Caprini score according to risk stratification (χ2 =196.308, P<0.001). Patients in the low-risk and moderate-risk groups had DVT incidence <0.5%. More than half of patients with DVT were in the highest risk group. Compared with the low-risk group, risk was 2.10-fold greater in the moderate-risk group, 3.34-fold greater in the high-risk group, and 16.12-fold greater in the highest-risk group with Caprini scores ≥ 9. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.78; P<0.01) for all patients. A Caprini score of ≥ 5 points was considered the criterion of a reliably increased risk of DVT in surgical patients with standard thromboprophylaxis. Predicting DVT using a cumulative risk score ≥ 4 is recommended for nonsurgical patients.
Conclusions:
Our study suggested that the 2010 Caprini RAM can be effectively used to stratify hospitalized Chinese patients into DVT risk categories, based on individual risk factors. Classification of the highest risk levels using a cumulative risk score ≥ 4 and ≥ 5 provides significantly greater clinical information in nonsurgical and surgical patients, respectively.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above...

