Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Decline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction During Follow-Up in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
Eri Minamino-Muta1, Takao Kato1, Takeshi Morimoto2
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Insights
A significant decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients managed conservatively predicts worse outcomes. This decline, observed at 1-year follow-up, is linked to increased AS-related deaths and heart failure hospitalizations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Echocardiography
Background:
- Severe aortic stenosis (AS) management is critical for patient outcomes.
- The prognostic significance of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decline in conservatively managed severe AS patients remains under-explored.
- Understanding LVEF changes can refine risk stratification and treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the prognostic impact of a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 1-year follow-up.
- To investigate the association between LVEF decline and clinical outcomes in patients with severe AS under conservative management.
- To identify risk factors for adverse events in severe AS patients based on LVEF changes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 839 patients with severe AS from the CURRENT AS registry, managed conservatively and with 1-year follow-up echocardiography.
- Primary outcome: composite of AS-related deaths and hospitalization for heart failure.
- Statistical analysis included survival analysis and multivariable regression to adjust for confounders.
Main Results:
- 10.8% of patients experienced >10% decline in LVEF at 1 year.
- LVEF decline was associated with increased left ventricular dimensions, valve regurgitation, and atrial fibrillation.
- The 3-year cumulative incidence of the primary outcome was significantly higher in patients with LVEF decline (39.5% vs. 26.5%, p < 0.001).
- LVEF decline remained a significant independent predictor of adverse outcomes (HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.29-3.06).
Conclusions:
- A >10% decline in LVEF at 1 year in conservatively managed severe AS patients is associated with significantly worse clinical outcomes.
- This finding holds true across different baseline LVEF subgroups.
- Monitoring LVEF decline is crucial for risk stratification in severe AS patients not undergoing immediate intervention.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of the decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 1-year follow-up in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) managed conservatively.
Background:
No previous study has explored the association between LVEF decline during follow-up and clinical outcomes in patients with severe AS.
Methods:
Among 3,815 patients with severe AS enrolled in the multicenter CURRENT AS (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis) registry in Japan, 839 conservatively managed patients who underwent echocardiography at 1-year follow-up were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was a composite of AS-related deaths and hospitalization for heart failure.
Results:
There were 91 patients (10.8%) with >10% declines in LVEF and 748 patients (89.2%) without declines. Left ventricular dimensions and the prevalence of valve regurgitation and atrial fibrillation or flutter significantly increased in the group with declines in LVEF. The cumulative 3-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was significantly higher in the group with declines in LVEF than in the group with no decline (39.5% vs. 26.5%; p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the excess risk of decline in LVEF over no decline for the primary outcome measure remained significant (hazard ratio: 1.98; 95% confidence interval: 1.29 to 3.06). When stratified by LVEF at index echocardiography (≥70%, 60% to 69%, and <60%), the risk of decline in LVEF on the primary outcome was consistently seen in all the subgroups, without any interaction (p = 0.77).
Conclusions:
Patients with severe AS with >10% declines in LVEF at 1 year after diagnosis had worse AS-related clinical outcomes than those without declines in LVEF under conservative management. (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Registry; UMIN000012140).
More Related Videos
04:48Noninvasive Determination of Vortex Formation Time Using Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiac Surgery
Published on: November 28, 2018
08:19Transthoracic Echocardiography to Assess Post-Resuscitation Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest in Pigs
Published on: July 12, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction