Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

A Uniaxial Compression Experiment with CO2-Bearing Coal Using a Visualized and Constant-Volume Gas-Solid Coupling Test System
Published on: June 12, 2019
Effect of Different Acid-Modified Coking Coals on Quinoline Adsorption
Hongxiang Xu1, Penghui Wang1, Kejia Ning1
1School of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, Engineering Research Center for Mine and Municipal Solid Waste Recycling, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China.
Abstract:
The adsorption of quinoline from wastewater by coking coal (AC-1), HCl-modified coking coal (AC-2), HNO3-modified coking coal (AC-3), HF-modified coking coal (AC-4), and H2SO4-modified coking coals (AC-5) was investigated in this paper. The effects of acid-modified concentration, modification time, and adsorption time versus quinoline removal rate were studied by batch experiments. The quinoline concentration was measured by UV spectrophotometry, the average pore size and specific surface area of coking coal before and after modification were characterized through static nitrogen adsorption, the mineral composition of coking coal was tested by X-ray diffraction, the surface functional groups were tested by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and the surface topography was tested using a scanning electron microscope. The experimental results showed that the adsorption capacity of coking coals was the best when both the modification time was 120 min and the acid-modified concentration was 0.1 mol·L-1 and the quinoline removal rate reaches the highest when the adsorption time was 120 min. The specific surface area of AC-2 increased from 2.898 to 3.637 m2·g-1, and the removal rate of quinoline increased from 77.64 to 90.61%. Acids reacted with inorganic mineral impurities within coking coal such as hydrogen vanadium phosphate hydrate, which caused an increase in the specific surface area. A new peak appeared in the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy pattern at the wavenumber 2300 cm-1. The surface of coking coal modified by acids was rougher than that of AC-1. The adsorption capacity of coking coal was improved after modification, and modified coking coals have the highest potential as low-cost adsorbents for quinoline removal.
More Related Videos
10:44Preparation of Biomass-based Mesoporous Carbon with Higher Nitrogen-/Oxygen-chelating Adsorption for CuII Through Microwave Pre-Pyrolysis
Published on: February 12, 2019
11:38In situ FTIR Spectroscopy as a Tool for Investigation of Gas/Solid Interaction: Water-Enhanced CO2 Adsorption in UiO-66 Metal-Organic Framework
Published on: February 1, 2020