Assessment of two glycated hemoglobin immunoassays

Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level reflects chronic glycemic status if reliable tests are used, however, in some regions worldwide high performing assays might not be readily available. This study aimed to asses two HbA1c immunoassays, comparing them with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay, three methods available in Ecuador.

HbA1c were measured in 114 fresh whole blood-samples by DCA-Vantage point-of-care analyzer, I-Chroma portable fluorescent scanner immunoassay and BioRad Variant II Turbo HPLC. Normal and pathological HbA1c ranges were included. Blood samples with variants of hemoglobin were excluded. HbA1c values were expressed in National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program percentages and mmol/mol, as mean±standard deviation.

HbA1c results by HPLC and DCA-Vantage were similar: 6.3±1.7% (45±18.6mmol/mol) vs. 6.3±1.8% (45±19.7mmol/mol), respectively, P=0.057; while HbA1c values by I-Chroma were lower than HPLC, 5.8±1.9% (40±20.8mmol/mol), P<0.001. The coefficient of variation was below 2% for high and low HbA1c levels, in all methods studied. HbA1c values by HPLC and DCA-Vantage were highly correlated (Spearman's Rank Correlation [SRC]: 0.916), while the correlation among HPLC and I-Chroma was weak (SRC: 0.368). The mean bias between DCA-Vantage and HPLC was -0.02±0.29% (-0.2±3.2mmol/mol), while for I-Chroma and HPLC mean bias was -0.50±1.62% (-5.5±17.7mmol/mol).

HbA1c immunoassays DCA-Vantage was comparable to HPLC assay, showing good correlation, appropriate precision and low bias, whereas I-Chroma assay was precise but inaccurate. Therefore, DCA-Vantage has better performance than I-Chroma. These findings suggest that is convenient to assess the HbA1c immunoassays commercially available in our country, Ecuador.