Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
Extension of the "Cheap" Composite Approach to Noncovalent Interactions: The jun-ChS Scheme
Silvia Alessandrini1,2, Vincenzo Barone1, Cristina Puzzarini2
1Scuola Normale Superiore , Piazza dei Cavalieri 7 , I-56126 Pisa , Italy.
Abstract:
A new variant of the so-called "cheap" composite scheme has been purposely developed for the evaluation of the interaction energy of noncovalent molecular complexes, with its various contributions being tested for a set of 15 systems using the accurate interaction energies reported as reference values in the following: [ Řezáč, J. et al. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015 , 17 , 19268 - 19277 ]. The modified scheme, starting from the CCSD(T) method in conjunction with a triple-ζ-quality basis set augmented by diffuse functions, includes two additional terms computed at the MP2 level: (i) the extrapolation to the complete basis set (CBS) limit and (ii) the contribution of core-valence correlation effects (CV term). Various families of basis sets including diffuse functions have been tested for the CCSD(T) model as well as for the extrapolation to the CBS limit, with a mean absolute error of about 1% (below 0.2 kJ·mol-1 in absolute terms) obtained with the jun-cc-pVnZ and the jul-cc-pVnZ families. As far as the CV term is concerned, the cc-pCVTZ and cc-pwCVTZ basis sets provide comparable contributions, which are non-negligible in several cases. While the benchmark analysis has been carried out using accurate structures available in the literature, geometrical effects due to the use of reference B2PLYP(-D3BJ) geometries, optimized in conjunction with a triple-ζ-quality basis set, have been investigated, thus pointing out their suitability. Finally, the modified scheme has been applied to a number of test cases for which interaction energies were already available in the literature; among these, a number of molecular complexes bearing second-row atoms have been considered.
More Related Videos
06:35Construction and Systematical Symmetric Studies of a Series of Supramolecular Clusters with Binary or Ternary Ammonium Triphenylacetates
Published on: February 15, 2016
07:50Efficient Synthesis of All-Carbon Quaternary Centers via the Conjugate Addition of Functionalized Monoorganozinc Bromides
Published on: May 26, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II