Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Acquisition of Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data in the Rat
Published on: August 28, 2021
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Procedural Distress in Children: A Systematic Review
Naveen Poonai1,2,3, Joseph Spohn2, Ben Vandermeer4
1Department of Pediatrics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; naveen.poonai@lhsc.on.ca.
Insights
Intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) effectively sedates children during procedures, outperforming oral chloral hydrate and midazolam. While generally safe, potential cardiovascular side effects require consideration.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Anesthesiology
- Pharmacology
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) is an emerging agent for managing procedural distress in pediatric patients.
- Effective procedural sedation is crucial for improving patient comfort and cooperation during medical interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) for procedural sedation in children.
- To compare IND with other sedative agents commonly used in pediatric practice.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane) up to 2019.
- Included were 19 randomized controlled trials involving 2137 children, assessing the primary outcome of adequate sedation.
- Methodologic quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and GRADE system.
Main Results:
- Intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) demonstrated superiority over oral chloral hydrate and oral midazolam in several trials.
- IND showed comparable effectiveness to oral chloral hydrate, intranasal midazolam, and intranasal ketamine.
- Adverse events were less frequent with IND (9.2%) compared to comparator groups (16.6%), with no serious events reported.
Conclusions:
- Intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) appears more effective for sedating children than oral chloral hydrate and oral midazolam, based on current evidence.
- Potential cardiovascular adverse effects should be considered when using IND.
- Further high-quality trials are needed to confirm efficacy and safety due to methodologic limitations.
Context:
Intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) is an emerging agent for procedural distress in children.
Objective:
To explore the effectiveness of IND for procedural distress in children.
Data Sources:
We performed electronic searches of Medline (1946-2019), Embase (1980-2019), Google Scholar (2019), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1981-2019), and Cochrane Central Register.
Study Selection:
We included randomized trials of IND for procedures in children.
Data Extraction:
Methodologic quality of evidence was evaluated by using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system, respectively. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with adequate sedation.
Results:
Among 19 trials (N = 2137), IND was superior to oral chloral hydrate (3 trials), oral midazolam (1 trial), intranasal midazolam (1 trial), and oral dexmedetomidine (1 trial). IND was equivalent to oral chloral hydrate (2 trials), intranasal midazolam (2 trials), and intranasal ketamine (3 trials). IND was inferior to oral ketamine and a combination of IND plus oral ketamine (1 trial). Higher doses of IND were superior to lower doses (4 trials). Adverse effects were reported in 67 of 727 (9.2%) participants in the IND versus 98 of 591 (16.6%) in the comparator group. There were no reports of adverse events requiring resuscitative measures.
Limitations:
The adequacy of sedation was subjective, which possibly led to biased outcome reporting.
Conclusions:
Given the methodologic limitations of included trials, IND is likely more effective at sedating children compared to oral chloral hydrate and oral midazolam. However, this must be weighed against the potential for adverse cardiovascular effects.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Stages of General Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...

