Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Mistaken max befriends Duplo girl: No difference between a standard and an acted-out false belief task
Beate Priewasser1, Franziska Fowles1, Katharina Schweller1
1Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Abstract:
With their Duplo task, Rubio-Fernández and Geurts (2013) challenged the assumption that children under 4 years of age cannot pass the standard false belief test. In an attempt to replicate this task on a sample of 73 children aged 32-51 months, we added a standard change of location false belief task as well as a Duplo true belief task. Performance on the latter is crucial for interpreting answers in the Duplo false belief task as to whether they reflect evidence for understanding or merely exhibit a difference in guessing rate. We found (a) a greater variability of response types in both Duplo tasks, (b) no evidence that responses in the Duplo tasks reveal earlier competence than those in the standard false belief test, and (c) a reassuring correlation between false belief tasks, suggesting that the Duplo task does pick up understanding of belief in light of the standard test.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Understanding Deception
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Confirmation Biases
Counterfactual Thinking
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

