Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Hemocompatibility Testing of Blood-Contacting Implants in a Flow Loop Model Mimicking Human Blood Flow
Published on: March 5, 2020
Study of Biocompatibility of Membranes in Online Hemodiafiltration
Raquel Ojeda1, Marta Arias-Guillén1, Miquel Gómez1
1Department of Nephrology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Background:
The biocompatibility of dialysis membranes is a determining factor in avoiding chronic microinflammation in patients under haemodialysis. Lower biocompatibility has been related to increased inflammatory status, which is known to be associated with cardiovascular events. Classically, cellulose membranes have been considered bioincompatible. A new-generation of asymmetric cellulose triacetate (CTA) membranes allows the performance of high convective transport techniques, but there have been no studies of their biocompatibility. The aim of the present study was to analyze and compare the biocompatibility characteristics of 4 membranes, including CTA, in online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) patients.
Methods:
We included 15 patients in -OL-HDF. After a 2-week washout period with helixone membrane, each patient was treated with the 4 membranes (polyamide, polynephron, helixone and CTA) for 4 weeks in a randomized order. The other dialysis parameters were kept stable throughout the study. We studied changes in markers of the activation of the complement system, monocytes, platelets, and adhesion molecules with the 4 membranes, as well as inflammatory parameters.
Results:
Biocompatibility was similar among the membranes. There were no sustained differences in complement activation, measured by C3a and C5a levels, or in platelet activation, determined by levels of P-selectin and platelet-derived microparticles (CD41a+). No differences were observed in activated monocyte levels (CD14+/CD16+) or in plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-10 or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, although tumour necrosis factor-α levels decreased when the patients were dialyzed with CTA. No significant differences were found in markers of endothelial damage, assessed by levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and adhesion molecules (intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1).
Conclusion:
The 4 membranes evaluated in this study in stable patients on OL-HDF, including the new-generation CTA, show similar biocompatibility with the methods applied.
More Related Videos
10:19Three-Dimensionally Printed Microfluidic Cross-flow System for Ultrafiltration/Nanofiltration Membrane Performance Testing
Published on: February 13, 2016
08:44An In Vitro Hemodynamic Loop Model to Investigate the Hemocytocompatibility and Host Cell Activation of Vascular Medical Devices
Published on: August 21, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Dialysis
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Hemoperfusion and Hemofiltration
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Membrane Fluidity