Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development
Published on: April 19, 2024
Do the opinions of pediatricians influence their recommendations on complementary feeding? Preliminary results
Paolo Brambilla1, Marco Giussani1, Marina Picca1
1Società Italiana delle Cure Primarie Pediatriche (Italian Society of Family Pediatricians), Milan, Italy.
Insights
Most Italian pediatricians prioritize infant developmental readiness over nutritional needs when recommending complementary feeding. Those focusing on readiness may offer less detailed nutritional guidance, though a consensus is emerging.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Infant Development
- Primary Care Pediatrics
Background:
- Complementary feeding practices are a subject of ongoing debate among pediatricians.
- Key discussion points include prioritizing infant nutritional needs versus developmental readiness for initiating complementary feeding.
- Current recommendations are influenced by scientific evidence, cultural traditions, and individual pediatrician beliefs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the timing and motivations behind pediatricians' recommendations for starting complementary feeding.
- To investigate the criteria pediatricians use to determine the appropriate age for introducing solid foods.
- To compare the practices of pediatricians who prioritize developmental readiness versus nutritional needs.
Main Methods:
- An 8-item online survey was distributed to active members of the Italian Society of Primary Care Pediatricians.
- The survey assessed the criteria used for initiating complementary feeding, recommended timing, and feeding modalities.
- Response rate was 43.3% (350 out of 808 participants).
Main Results:
- Over 60% of pediatricians prioritized developmental readiness (60.9%) over nutritional needs (39.1%) for starting complementary feeding.
- Approximately 74% recommended starting complementary feeding between 5 and 6 months of age.
- Pediatricians prioritizing nutritional needs were more likely to suggest earlier feeding initiation and provide specific advice on meat quantity and salt introduction.
Conclusions:
- A majority of Italian pediatricians emphasize developmental readiness when guiding parents on complementary feeding.
- Pediatricians focusing on developmental readiness may provide less specific nutritional advice compared to those prioritizing nutritional needs.
- There is an emerging trend towards harmonizing recommendations regarding the timing of complementary feeding initiation.
Abstract:
Complementary feeding practices are debated among pediatricians, primarily regarding whether nutritional needs or developmental readiness should be prioritized in recommendations for starting complementary feeding. The aim of the present study was to analyze the timing of the start of complementary feeding and the related motivations with an 8-item online survey administered to active members of the Italian Society of Primary Care Pediatricians. The participation rate was 43.3% (350 of 808), and 213 (60.9%) and 137 (39.1%) of the participants chose items related to developmental readiness and nutritional needs, respectively, as the criteria for starting complementary feeding. Approximately 74% of the participants reported that they recommended starting complementary feeding between 5 and 6 months of age, 17% recommended starting before 5 months, and 8% recommended starting after 6 months. Predefined schemes were proposed by 38% of the participants, and a responsive feeding modality was proposed by 13%, while the majority (49%) recommended both modalities depending on family characteristics. Regarding recommendations based on nutritional needs, 89% of pediatricians reported providing indications concerning the quantity of meat consumed during the first year of life, and 91% reported recommending introducing added salt only after 12 months of age. Compared with pediatricians who emphasized developmental readiness, those who prioritized nutritional needs suggested earlier complementary feeding start and a higher use of predefined schemes and were more likely to make recommendations regarding meat quantity and added salt (p < 0.0001).Conclusions: Pediatricians who used a developmental readiness criterion for starting complementary feeding may less frequently provide nutritional advice to parents, even if a trend to harmonize the different positions regarding complementary feeding start time is emerging.What is Known:• Pediatricians make suggestions for introducing complementary feeding based on scientific evidence, local traditions, and personal beliefs.• Either infants' nutritional needs or their developmental readiness currently is used as determinant for the timing of complementary feeding.What is New:• More than 60% of Italian pediatricians consider developmental readiness a priority for introducing complementary feeding.• Pediatricians following the criterion of developmental readiness may less frequently give detailed nutritional advice.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...

