The effect of extraction techniques on calcium concentrations and isotope ratios of marine pore water

Comparing two different techniques applied for the extraction of marine pore water samples from sediments, the well-established whole round (WR) method and the more recent Rhizon method, in terms of their effects on stable calcium isotope ratios in extracted pore waters, we recognize a systematic offset between the two sampling methods. Higher δ^44/40Ca values are associated with lower Ca concentrations for the Rhizon sampling technique and lower δ^44/40Ca values are associated with higher Ca concentrations for the corresponding WR-derived pore water samples. Models involving Rayleigh fractionation and mixing calculation suggest that the observed offset is most likely caused by a combined process of CaCO₃ precipitation and ion exchange taking place during Rhizon sampling-induced CO₂ degassing. Changing pressure, extraction time or extraction yield during WR pressing does not lead to a variation in δ^44/40Ca, indicating that no Ca isotope fractionation takes place during the sampling of pore water. On the basis of analytical and modelling results, WR samples appear to provide δ^44/40Ca values that are more representative of the 'true' pore water isotopic composition. While the difference between the sampling techniques is close to the present-day analytical precision of Ca isotope analysis, it may become more relevant with increasing analytical precision in the future.