Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Competing risks analysis of time-to-event data for cardiovascular surgeons
Steven J Staffa1, David Zurakowski1
1Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Competing risks analysis is crucial for accurate time-to-event data in cardiovascular surgery. This practical guide helps surgeons and biostatisticians avoid invalid conclusions from traditional survival analysis when outside events occur.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Biostatistics
- Survival Analysis
Background:
- Traditional time-to-event analysis assumes noninformative censoring, which is often violated in clinical practice.
- The presence of competing risks, where an event other than the one of interest can occur, can lead to biased and invalid conclusions.
- Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons frequently encounter scenarios where competing risks are present in their patient data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a practical, step-by-step strategy for implementing competing risks analysis in time-to-event data analysis.
- To guide thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons in collaborating effectively with biostatisticians for accurate analysis.
- To highlight the limitations of traditional survival analysis in the presence of competing risks.
Main Methods:
- A five-step approach is outlined: (1) determine the need for competing risks analysis, (2) perform nonparametric analysis, (3) conduct model-based analysis, (4) interpret results, and (5) compare with traditional methods.
- The approach is demonstrated using a hypothetical cardiovascular surgery case involving mortality after the Fontan operation.
- Nonparametric, semiparametric (Fine-Gray model), and parametric methods are applied to analyze time-to-event data.
Main Results:
- Traditional Cox regression identified prematurity as a significant risk factor for mortality after stage 3 (HR, 1.26; P=.009).
- However, competing risks analysis using the Fine-Gray model, which accounted for mortality during stage 2, found prematurity not to be a significant predictor (HR, 1.07; P=.467).
- This illustrates how competing risks analysis can alter conclusions regarding risk factors.
Conclusions:
- Competing risks analysis provides a more accurate assessment of time-to-event data when competing events are present.
- The proposed step-by-step strategy makes competing risks analysis more accessible for cardiac surgeons and biostatisticians.
- Accurate interpretation of time-to-event data through competing risks analysis is essential for reliable clinical conclusions.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Cancer Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

