Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Complex Assembly02:41

Protein Complex Assembly

16.5K
Proteins can form homomeric complexes with another unit of the same protein or heteromeric complexes with different types.  Most protein complexes self-assemble spontaneously via ordered pathways, while some proteins need assembly factors that guide their proper assembly. Despite the crowded intracellular environment, proteins usually interact with their correct partners and form functional complexes.
Many viruses self-assemble into a fully functional unit using the infected host cell to...
16.5K
Protein Folding01:22

Protein Folding

125.6K
Overview
125.6K
Protein Folding01:25

Protein Folding

10.8K
Proteins are chains of amino acids linked together by peptide bonds. Upon synthesis, a protein folds into a three-dimensional conformation, critical to its biological function. Interactions between its constituent amino acids guide protein folding, and hence the protein structure is primarily dependent on its amino acid sequence.
Protein Structure Is Critical to Its Biological Function
Proteins perform a wide range of biological functions such as catalyzing chemical reactions, providing...
10.8K
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

14.4K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
14.4K
Assembly of Signaling Complexes01:30

Assembly of Signaling Complexes

6.4K
Multiprotein signaling complexes are formed in a dynamic process involving protein-protein interactions at the cytoplasmic domain of transmembrane receptors or enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins associated with the receptor. These complexes ensure the activation and propagation of intracellular signals that regulate cell functions.
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
6.4K
Assembly of Cytoskeletal Filaments01:18

Assembly of Cytoskeletal Filaments

27.0K
Cytoskeletal filaments are polymeric forms of smaller protein subunits. However, individual cytoskeletal filaments may easily disassemble or associate with other similar filaments to form rigid structures. Microfilaments, made of actin monomers, rely on actin-binding proteins to form bundles and create networks of individual actin filaments. Microtubules rely on microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) to form sturdy cylindrical structures. However, the proteins involved in forming complex...
27.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Actin-dependent regulation of RSV F-mediated cell-cell fusion revealed by visualizing its spatiotemporal dynamics.

Nanoscale horizons·2026
Same author

Sequence-Derived and Molecular Descriptors for Interpretable Modeling of Molecular Systems: Insights from Peptide Hemolysis.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Cooperative membrane association as a mechanistic origin of synergistic antimicrobial peptide activity.

RSC chemical biology·2026
Same author

Multiscale Simulations Reveal Dynamics Interfacial Network and Membrane Remodeling of the Ankyrin-1 Complex.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2026
Same author

Stochastic mechanism of dominant follicle selection: selection of one suppresses selection of others.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026
Same author

From Disordered to Ordered: Nanoscale Spectroscopy Reveals Structural Evolution of Amyloid Beta 40 Fibrils.

Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Formation of Ordered Biomolecular Structures by the Self-assembly of Short Peptides
07:26

Formation of Ordered Biomolecular Structures by the Self-assembly of Short Peptides

Published on: November 21, 2013

13.3K

Molecular Model for the Surface-Catalyzed Protein Self-Assembly.

Yangang Pan1, Siddhartha Banerjee1, Karen Zagorski1

  • 1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy , University of Nebraska Medical Center , 986025 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha , Nebraska 68198-6025 , United States.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B
|December 24, 2019
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how surfaces influence the aggregation of amyloidogenic proteins, which are linked to diseases like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. The researchers developed a model suggesting that proteins temporarily stuck to surfaces can increase local concentration, acting as nucleation sites for aggregation. They tested this model using α-synuclein, a protein involved in Parkinson's, and APOBEC3G, a non-amyloidogenic protein. Experiments on mica surfaces showed that α-synuclein aggregated at low concentrations, while APOBEC3G did not. These findings support the model's prediction that surface interactions accelerate aggregation. The study provides a physical-chemical explanation for how surfaces may play a role in disease-related protein aggregation.

Keywords:
surface-catalyzed aggregationamyloidogenic proteinsneurodegenerative disease mechanismsprotein aggregation kinetics

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Detecting and Characterizing Protein Self-Assembly In Vivo by Flow Cytometry
05:58

Detecting and Characterizing Protein Self-Assembly In Vivo by Flow Cytometry

Published on: July 17, 2019

11.4K
Author Spotlight: Optimization of Ultrashort Peptide Matrices for Colorectal Cancer Organoids
10:23

Author Spotlight: Optimization of Ultrashort Peptide Matrices for Colorectal Cancer Organoids

Published on: May 3, 2024

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Formation of Ordered Biomolecular Structures by the Self-assembly of Short Peptides
07:26

Formation of Ordered Biomolecular Structures by the Self-assembly of Short Peptides

Published on: November 21, 2013

13.3K
Detecting and Characterizing Protein Self-Assembly In Vivo by Flow Cytometry
05:58

Detecting and Characterizing Protein Self-Assembly In Vivo by Flow Cytometry

Published on: July 17, 2019

11.4K
Author Spotlight: Optimization of Ultrashort Peptide Matrices for Colorectal Cancer Organoids
10:23

Author Spotlight: Optimization of Ultrashort Peptide Matrices for Colorectal Cancer Organoids

Published on: May 3, 2024

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Protein aggregation in neurodegenerative disease research
  • Biophysics of amyloidogenic protein interactions
  • Surface-mediated self-assembly in molecular biology

Background:

Neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's involve the aggregation of amyloidogenic proteins. While it is known that cell surfaces influence this process, the exact molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Prior research has shown that membranes can facilitate aggregation, but the role of surfaces in this context is less understood. Studies have found that aggregation occurs at low concentrations when surfaces are present, suggesting a significant role for surface interactions. However, the specific molecular events driving this phenomenon have not been fully explained. This gap motivated the development of a theoretical model to clarify the process. The model aims to explain how surfaces influence aggregation kinetics. It builds on prior findings that surface interactions can accelerate aggregation.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aimed to develop a theoretical model to explain how surfaces influence the aggregation of amyloidogenic proteins. The researchers focused on understanding the molecular mechanisms behind surface-catalyzed aggregation. They sought to determine if surface interactions could act as nucleation sites for aggregation. The model was designed to test whether immobilized monomers could increase local protein concentration. The study also aimed to verify the model experimentally using specific proteins. The proteins chosen included α-synuclein, known for its role in Parkinson's disease, and APOBEC3G, a non-amyloidogenic control. The goal was to compare aggregation behavior on surfaces. The study aimed to provide a physical-chemical explanation for observed aggregation patterns.

Main Methods:

The researchers developed a theoretical framework to model surface-catalyzed protein aggregation. They proposed that monomers immobilized on surfaces could act as nucleation sites. Experimental validation was conducted using mica surfaces as a model system. The aggregation kinetics of α-synuclein and APOBEC3G were measured on these surfaces. The study compared the behavior of amyloidogenic and non-amyloidogenic proteins. Surface interactions were analyzed to determine their effect on aggregation rates. The model was tested under physiologically relevant conditions. The results were used to confirm the theoretical predictions about surface-mediated aggregation.

Main Results:

The model predicted that surface-immobilized monomers increase local concentration and act as nucleation sites. Experimental results supported this prediction for α-synuclein. Aggregation occurred at low concentrations when surfaces were present. The study found that mica surfaces significantly accelerated aggregation kinetics. APOBEC3G showed minimal aggregation on surfaces, confirming the model's specificity. The data demonstrated that surface interactions are critical for amyloidogenic proteins. The model explained how surfaces facilitate aggregation at physiological concentrations. These findings suggest that surface interactions are a key factor in disease-related aggregation.

Conclusions:

The study provides a theoretical model explaining how surfaces influence protein aggregation. The model suggests that immobilized monomers act as nucleation sites, increasing local concentration. Experimental validation using α-synuclein and APOBEC3G confirmed the model's predictions. The findings indicate that surface interactions are critical for amyloidogenic proteins. The model explains aggregation at low concentrations, as observed in disease states. The study highlights the role of surfaces in accelerating aggregation kinetics. The results suggest that surface-mediated aggregation is a significant factor in neurodegenerative diseases. The authors propose that this model could guide future research on aggregation mechanisms.

The model suggests that monomers immobilized on surfaces increase local concentration, acting as nucleation sites to accelerate aggregation.

α-synuclein is amyloidogenic and implicated in Parkinson's disease, making it a relevant protein for studying aggregation mechanisms.

Surfaces facilitate aggregation by immobilizing monomers, which increases local concentration and acts as nucleation sites.

APOBEC3G serves as a non-amyloidogenic control protein to compare aggregation behavior with α-synuclein on surfaces.

Aggregation at low concentrations suggests that surface interactions are sufficient to trigger disease-related processes.

The model suggests that surface interactions may be a key factor in the aggregation processes underlying Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.