Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

08:05
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
Published on: June 30, 2020
8.0K
Learning what to change: Young children use "difference-making" to identify causally relevant variables
Mariel K Goddu1, Alison Gopnik1
1Department of Psychology.
Developmental Psychology
|December 24, 2019
Summary
Young children can identify causal variables in new situations. They understand that a "difference-making" variable in one system is relevant for other causal problems.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Development
- Causal Reasoning
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- Causal reasoning is crucial for understanding and interacting with the world.
- Identifying relevant variables for intervention is a key challenge in novel causal systems.
- Previous research often uses preselected variables, limiting understanding of variable selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how young children (3-5 years old) select relevant causal variables in unfamiliar systems.
- To determine if children can infer causal relevance from limited evidence.
- To explore children's generalization of causal variable relevance across different problems.
Main Methods:
- Children were presented with novel causal systems.
- Their ability to select the correct variable for intervention was assessed.
- Evidence regarding 'difference-making' variables was provided.
Main Results:
- Young children successfully identified causally relevant variables from sparse evidence.
- Children generalized the concept of 'difference-making' variables to new causal contexts.
- Children inferred that manipulating a relevant variable could lead to novel outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Even young children can learn and apply causal variable selection strategies.
- Children's causal learning is supported by inferring 'difference-making' properties.
- This ability is foundational for more complex causal understanding and problem-solving.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Learning
937
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
937
Purposive Learning
386
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
386
Observational Learning
760
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
760
Group Design
10.1K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.1K
Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development from Childhood into Adulthood
1.2K
Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development emphasizes the role of thinking in a child's learning process, suggesting that children are naturally curious about their environment. His approach to development is discontinuous, proposing that cognitive abilities progress through distinct stages, each with unique characteristics. Central to Piaget's theory is schemata—mental structures that allow individuals to understand and interpret the world.
Schemata: Building Blocks of Knowledge
Schemata: Building Blocks of Knowledge
1.2K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
418
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
418

