Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

In Vivo Mouse Model of Spinal Implant Infection
Published on: June 23, 2020
What are the Risk Factors for Deep Infection in OTA/AO 43C Pilon Fractures?
Clay A Spitler1, Robert Miles Hulick2, John Weldy3
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Insights
Deep infection risk in OTA/AO 43C pilon fractures is linked to severe open fractures and specific wound locations. Segmental bone loss and soft tissue coverage needs are key predictors of infection.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Trauma Care
- Infectious Disease Prevention
Background:
- Tibial pilon fractures (OTA/AO 43C) are complex injuries often associated with significant soft tissue damage.
- Deep infection is a major complication following operative treatment of these fractures, impacting outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify independent risk factors for deep infection in patients with OTA/AO 43C pilon fractures.
- To guide surgical decision-making and improve infection prevention strategies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case-control study at a Level 1 trauma center.
- Analysis of 150 patients with OTA/AO 43C pilon fractures treated operatively over 5 years.
- Evaluation of deep infection rates based on fracture characteristics, wound location, and surgical approach.
Main Results:
- The overall deep infection rate was 16.7%.
- Gustilo-Anderson type 3A and 3B fractures, medial/anterior open wound locations, and posterolateral surgical approaches were associated with higher infection rates.
- Segmental bone loss and the need for soft tissue coverage were the only independent risk factors for deep infection.
Conclusions:
- High-grade open pilon fractures, particularly with medial/anterior wounds, are at increased risk of deep infection.
- Surgical approach selection requires careful consideration of fracture pattern and soft tissue injury.
- Segmental bone loss and soft tissue coverage requirements are critical factors driving deep infection risk.
Objectives:
To determine the risk factors for deep infection in OTA/AO 43C pilon fractures.
Design:
Retrospective, case-control study.
Setting:
Single institution, Level 1 trauma center.
Participants:
All patients with 43C pilon fractures treated over a 5-year period with follow-up to bony union. One hundred fifty of 169 of identified patients met inclusion criteria.
Intervention:
Operative treatment of tibial pilon fracture.
Main Outcome Measurements:
Deep infection; patient demographics, Gustilo-Anderson classification, location of open fracture wounds, surgical approaches.
Results:
The overall rate of deep infection was 16.7%. Body mass index, tobacco use, and diabetes were not associated with deep infection. The rate of Gustilo-Anderson type 3A and 3B fractures was significantly higher in those with infection, but the overall open fracture rate was not significantly different between the groups. Medial and anterior open fracture wound location was significantly associated with deep infection, whereas lateral open fracture wound location was not. In closed fractures, anteromedial and anterolateral approaches were not significantly associated with infection, but posterolateral approach was associated with deep infection. Segmental bone loss and the need for soft tissue coverage were the only independent risk factors for deep infection.
Conclusions:
High-grade open pilon fractures are at risk of deep infection, and medial/anterior open fracture wounds are particularly vulnerable to developing deep infection. The anteromedial/anterolateral surgical approaches should be selected based on a complete understanding of the fracture pattern and soft tissue injury; however, the posterolateral approach to the tibia should be used with some caution. Ultimately injury factors (segmental bone loss and need for soft tissue coverage) seem to be the most important variables in driving deep infection, and a complete understanding of the bone and soft tissue injury is needed to manage these injuries effectively.
Level Of Evidence:
Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
More Related Videos
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
04:41Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Healthcare Associated Infections I: Iatrogenic, Exogenic and Endogenic
HAIs significantly increase the cost of health care. Extended stays in healthcare institutions, increased disability, increased costs of medications, including specialized antibiotics, and prolonged recovery times add to the patient's expenses and the healthcare institution and funding bodies.
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management