Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Utility of ICD Codes for Stress Cardiomyopathy in Hospital Administrative Databases: What Do They Signify?
Anusha G Bhat1,2, Kevin White1, Kyle Gobeil1
1Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts.
Insights
International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes accurately identify stress cardiomyopathy (SCM) patients in databases, but some cases lack active symptoms, and diagnostic workups are inconsistent. Researchers should consider these limitations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- Administrative databases are crucial for medical research.
- International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes are frequently used to identify patients with specific conditions, such as stress cardiomyopathy (SCM).
- The accuracy and completeness of ICD code-based SCM identification in administrative data require validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for identifying patients with stress cardiomyopathy (SCM) in administrative databases.
- To assess the clinical presentation and diagnostic workup of SCM patients identified via ICD codes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of patients discharged with an ICD code for SCM between 2010 and 2016.
- Calculation of the positive predictive value (PPV) of ICD codes for SCM diagnosis.
- Analysis of clinical manifestations and diagnostic procedures (cardiac catheterization, echocardiography) in identified SCM patients.
Main Results:
- A high positive predictive value (98%) was found for ICD codes in identifying SCM.
- A small proportion (6.4%) of patients with an SCM ICD code did not present with active clinical manifestations during hospitalization.
- Inconsistent diagnostic workup was observed, with only 66.8% undergoing cardiac catheterization and 91.5% undergoing echocardiography.
Conclusions:
- ICD codes are largely accurate for identifying SCM diagnoses in administrative databases.
- Limitations include the presence of chronic SCM cases and incomplete diagnostic workups in some patients.
- Researchers utilizing administrative data for SCM studies must be aware of these potential biases and limitations.
Abstract:
Prior studies of stress cardiomyopathy (SCM) have used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes to identify patients in administrative databases without evaluating the validity of these codes. Between 2010 and 2016, we identified 592 patients discharged with a first known principal or secondary ICD code for SCM in our medical system. On chart review, 580 charts had a diagnosis of SCM (positive predictive value 98%; 95% CI: 96.4-98.8), although 38 (6.4%) did not have active clinical manifestations of SCM during the hospitalization. Moreover, only 66.8% underwent cardiac catheterization and 91.5% underwent echocardiography. These findings suggest that, although all but a few hospitalized patients with an ICD code for SCM had a diagnosis of SCM, some of these were chronic cases, and numerous patients with a new diagnosis of SCM did not undergo a complete diagnostic workup. Researchers should be mindful of these limitations in future studies involving administrative databases.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification