Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sampling Methods: Overview01:06

Sampling Methods: Overview

2.0K
A sample refers to a smaller subset representative of a larger population. In analytical chemistry, studying or analyzing an entire population is often impractical or impossible. Therefore, samples are used to draw inferences and generalize the whole population. The sampling method selects individuals or items from a population to create a sample. Standard sampling methods include random, judgemental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling. 
In analytical chemistry, the choice of...
2.0K
Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

1.8K
Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
1.8K
Sampling Distribution01:12

Sampling Distribution

16.5K
Given simple random samples of size n from a given population with a measured characteristic such as mean, proportion, or standard deviation for each sample, the probability distribution of all the measured characteristics is called a sampling distribution. How much the statistic varies from one sample to another is known as the sampling variability of a statistic. You typically measure the sampling variability of a statistic by its standard error. The standard error of the mean is an example...
16.5K
Sampling Theorem01:15

Sampling Theorem

1.2K
In signal processing, the analysis of continuous-time signals, denoted as x(t), often involves sampling techniques to convert these signals into discrete-time signals. This process is essential for digital representation and manipulation. A critical component in sampling is the train of impulses, characterized by the sampling interval and the sampling frequency. The relationship between these parameters and the original signal's properties dictates the success of the sampling process.
1.2K
Sampling Continuous Time Signal01:11

Sampling Continuous Time Signal

626
In signal processing, a continuous-time signal can be sampled using an impulse-train sampling technique, followed by the zero-order hold method. Impulse-train sampling involves the use of a periodic impulse train, which consists of a series of delta functions spaced at regular intervals determined by the sampling period. When a continuous-time signal is multiplied by this impulse train, it generates impulses with amplitudes corresponding to the signal's values at the sampling points.
In the...
626
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

836
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
836

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chaotic Fluctuations in a Universal Set of Transmon Qubit Gates.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

In Science Journals.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Differentiating Between Enantiomers with Nuclear Quadrupole Coupling Using Microwave Three-Wave Mixing.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2025
Same author

Attosecond control and measurement of chiral photoionization dynamics.

Nature·2025
Same author

Feshbach Resonances in Cold Collisions: Benchmarking State-of-the-Art Ab Initio Potential Energy Surfaces.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2025
Same author

Anisotropy Factor Spectra for Weakly Allowed Electronic Transitions in Chiral Ketones.

Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry·2024
Same journal

Erratum: Low-dimensional model for adaptive networks of spiking neurons [Phys. Rev. E 111, 014422 (2025)].

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Disentangling the effects of many-body forces on depletion interactions.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Charge transport and mode transition in dual-energy electron beam diodes.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Optimization of multisite reactions in complex compartmentalized media.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Origin of geometric cohesion in nonconvex granular materials: Interplay between interdigitation and rotational constraints enhancing frictional stability.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Interaction of walkers with a standing Faraday wave.

Physical review. E·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

14.9K

Optimized sampling of mixed-state observables.

Marec W Heger1, Christiane P Koch1, Daniel M Reich1

  • 1Theoretische Physik, Universität Kassel, 34132 Kassel, Germany.

Physical Review. E
|December 25, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Simulating quantum systems is computationally intensive. This study compares random-phase and eigenstate sampling methods for quantum ensembles, finding eigenstate sampling superior for purer states and offering error estimation and convergence improvements.

More Related Videos

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience
10:56

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience

Published on: April 13, 2019

7.6K
Single-Molecule Tracking Microscopy - A Tool for Determining the Diffusive States of Cytosolic Molecules
10:20

Single-Molecule Tracking Microscopy - A Tool for Determining the Diffusive States of Cytosolic Molecules

Published on: September 5, 2019

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

14.9K
An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience
10:56

An Unbiased Approach of Sampling TEM Sections in Neuroscience

Published on: April 13, 2019

7.6K
Single-Molecule Tracking Microscopy - A Tool for Determining the Diffusive States of Cytosolic Molecules
10:20

Single-Molecule Tracking Microscopy - A Tool for Determining the Diffusive States of Cytosolic Molecules

Published on: September 5, 2019

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum mechanics
  • Computational physics
  • Quantum information science

Background:

  • Simulating quantum dynamical systems with statistical ensembles presents significant computational challenges, particularly when representing mixed states.
  • Approximating time-dependent observables in fully unitary dynamics (e.g., ultrafast coherent control at finite temperatures) often involves sampling the density operator using wave functions with randomized phases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of random-phase wave function sampling against eigenstate-based sampling for quantum dynamical simulations of statistical ensembles.
  • To develop methods for estimating sampling errors and improving the efficiency of these simulation techniques.

Main Methods:

  • The study analyzes the performance of random-phase wave functions and eigenstate-based sampling for approximating time-dependent observables.
  • It involves proving that eigenstate-based sampling minimizes the worst-case error for computing arbitrary observables.
  • Refinements to both sampling schemes are presented to accelerate convergence by removing redundant information.

Main Results:

  • Random-phase wave functions perform well for highly mixed ensembles, while eigenstate-based sampling is superior for ensembles with higher purity.
  • A method is established to qualitatively estimate ensemble purities where eigenstate sampling outperforms random-phase sampling.
  • The study demonstrates that eigenstate-based sampling uniquely minimizes the worst-case error for computing observables.

Conclusions:

  • Eigenstate-based sampling offers a more accurate and robust approach for simulating quantum ensembles, especially those with higher purity.
  • The developed error estimation and refinement techniques enhance the computational efficiency and reliability of quantum dynamical simulations.
  • Exploiting the structure of low-rank observables can further optimize eigenstate-based sampling schemes for complex quantum systems.