Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

24.4K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
24.4K
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

7.1K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
7.1K
Punishment01:27

Punishment

776
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
776
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation01:21

Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation

626
Affiliation motivation is the intrinsic desire to connect with others and belong to a social group, which plays a crucial role in forming and maintaining personal relationships. This type of motivation is essential for psychological well-being, as it provides individuals with a sense of community and support. An example of this is a student who joins a study group in order to feel a sense of connection. People with high affiliation motivation actively seek social approval, take satisfaction in...
626
Operant Conditioning01:21

Operant Conditioning

2.7K
Operant conditioning, a key concept in behavioral psychology, involves using reinforcement and punishment to alter the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. B.F. introduced this type of conditioning. Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors and the consequences that follow them, influencing whether these behaviors will be strengthened or diminished.
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
2.7K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.7K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mechanistic Understanding of the Divergent Cyclizations of o-Alkynylbenzaldehyde Acetals and Thioacetals Catalyzed by Metal Halides.

Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2015
Same author

Quantification of the Iodine Content of Perigastric Adipose Tissue by Dual-Energy CT: A Novel Method for Preoperative Diagnosis of T4-Stage Gastric Cancer.

PloS one·2015
Same author

[Anterior interhemispheric approach through the lamina terminalis for large intra- and extra-ventricular craniopharyngiomas].

Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]·2015
Same author

Syringe Injectable Electronics: Precise Targeted Delivery with Quantitative Input/Output Connectivity.

Nano letters·2015
Same author

Geometric discord: A resource for increments of quantum key generation through twirling.

Scientific reports·2015
Same author

Zero-Determinant Strategies in Iterated Public Goods Game.

Scientific reports·2015
Same journal

Erratum: Low-dimensional model for adaptive networks of spiking neurons [Phys. Rev. E 111, 014422 (2025)].

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Disentangling the effects of many-body forces on depletion interactions.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Charge transport and mode transition in dual-energy electron beam diodes.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Optimization of multisite reactions in complex compartmentalized media.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Origin of geometric cohesion in nonconvex granular materials: Interplay between interdigitation and rotational constraints enhancing frictional stability.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Interaction of walkers with a standing Faraday wave.

Physical review. E·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 1, 2026

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.2K

Cooperator-driven and defector-driven punishments: How do they influence cooperation?

Pengbi Cui1,2,3, Zhi-Xi Wu4, Tao Zhou3,5,6

  • 1School of Astronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710072, People's Republic of China.

Physical Review. E
|December 25, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores how self-regulation and government regulation, using punishment, influence cooperation. Networked populations benefit more from cooperator-driven punishment for promoting public cooperation.

More Related Videos

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

2.9K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 1, 2026

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.2K
A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
08:05

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence

Published on: March 23, 2022

2.9K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary game theory
  • Behavioral economics
  • Social dynamics

Background:

  • Economic studies identify self-regulation and government regulation as key to corporate adherence and industry governance.
  • Understanding the quantitative role of these regulation schemes in evolutionary dynamics is crucial.
  • Punishment is a typical enforcement mechanism for regulations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively analyze the impact of self-regulation and government regulation on evolutionary dynamics.
  • To investigate the role of different punishment strategies in promoting public cooperation.
  • To compare the effectiveness of regulation schemes in well-mixed versus networked populations.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a game model considering six evolutionary situations with strategy combinations.
  • Application of a semi-analytical method for estimating boundaries between defection and non-defection phases.
  • Detailed statistical analysis of strategy frequencies and spatial pattern formations.

Main Results:

  • A mix of punishments is more effective than a single punishment in well-mixed populations.
  • Cooperator-driven punishment is superior in networked populations for promoting cooperation.
  • Network structures generally favor punishers and public cooperation due to network reciprocity and mutualism.

Conclusions:

  • Networked structures are more conducive to public cooperation than well-mixed populations.
  • Optimal feedback sensitivity is crucial for promoting punishers' populations in networked settings.
  • Findings offer insights for selecting and enforcing effective regulation measures to sustain public cooperation.