Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
How current reporting practices may mask differences: A call for examining cancer-specific demographic enrollment
Hala T Borno1,2, Eric J Small1,2, Li Zhang3,2
1University of California at San Francisco, Division of Hematology/Oncology, United States.
Background:
A lack of diversity among clinical trial (CT) participants remains a critical problem. Few studies have examined recruitment variability in cancer treatment CTs by cancer type. Given the increasing organ-specific specialization of oncologic care, an understanding of this variability may affect institutional recruitment practices.
Methods:
This study examines three data sources from 2010 through 2014. The analyzed sample includes 3,580 CT participants identified in the institutional Clinical Trials Management System (CTMS) database and 20,305 incident cases of invasive cancer within a Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) institutional catchment area. A total of 341,114 incident cases of primary invasive cancer were identified through the California Cancer Registry (CCR). The primary study measurements were sociodemographic characteristics of the three populations (age, sex, race/ethnicity, and health insurance).
Results:
Racial/ethnic disparities were observed, with more incident cases of Whites seen in cancer center (68%) and enrolled in CTs (72%) compared to incident cases in catchment area (67%) (p < 0.001) overall. More older adults (65) were enrolled in prostate cancer CTs (58%) than seen in cancer center (45%) (p < 0.001). Alternatively, fewer older adults were enrolled in breast and colorectal CTs than seen in cancer center (p < 0.001). Among colon (p < 0.001), breast (p < 0.001), and prostate (p<0.001) cancer types, insurance type significantly varied between incident cases in catchment area, cancer center, and among CT participants. For colorectal cancer, no difference in sex distribution was observed overall. A significant difference in insurance type within each cancer type was observed (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
These findings suggest that reporting overall recruitment frequencies may mask differences by cancer type.
Insights
Clinical trial diversity varies by cancer type. Older adults are overrepresented in prostate cancer trials but underrepresented in breast and colorectal cancer trials, highlighting the need for type-specific recruitment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Health Disparities
Background:
- Lack of diversity in clinical trial participants is a persistent issue.
- Variability in cancer treatment clinical trial recruitment by cancer type is understudied.
- Understanding recruitment variability is crucial for optimizing institutional practices in specialized oncologic care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine recruitment variability in cancer treatment clinical trials based on cancer type.
- To analyze sociodemographic characteristics of clinical trial participants in relation to cancer type.
Main Methods:
- Utilized three data sources from 2010-2014, including institutional databases and the California Cancer Registry.
- Analyzed 3,580 clinical trial participants and over 341,000 incident cancer cases.
- Compared sociodemographic factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance) across different cancer types and populations.
Main Results:
- Observed racial/ethnic disparities, with higher proportions of White individuals in cancer center and clinical trial populations compared to the catchment area.
- Older adults were overrepresented in prostate cancer trials but underrepresented in breast and colorectal cancer trials.
- Significant variations in insurance type were noted across cancer types between catchment area, cancer center, and clinical trial participants.
Conclusions:
- Overall recruitment frequencies can obscure important differences in participant demographics across specific cancer types.
- Findings underscore the need for cancer type-specific analyses to address recruitment disparities.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Longitudinal Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials: Overview