Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Disparity Indices and Overweight: Frame of Reference
Wendell C Taylor1, Casey P Durand1, Gregory Knell1
1Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.
State rankings of body mass index (BMI) differ significantly based on whether national or state-specific income disparity data are used. Choosing the correct disparity index is crucial for accurate public health analysis.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Disparities Research
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Body Mass Index (BMI) is a key indicator of overweight and obesity.
- Income disparities are recognized social determinants of health impacting BMI.
- Standardizing disparity measures across states is challenging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare state-level BMI rankings using national versus state-specific income disparity indices.
- To evaluate the concordance between national and state-specific disparity measures.
- To determine the influence of index choice on public health interpretations.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data.
- Employed Spearman Rank Order Correlation with Bonferroni adjustment to assess relationships.
- Applied kappa statistic to measure concordance between indices.
Main Results:
- A very weak monotonic relationship (ρ=0.11, p=0.46) was found between the two disparity indices.
- The kappa statistic (κ=0.02, p=0.43) indicated poor concordance between national and state-specific indices.
- State rankings of BMI varied considerably depending on the disparity index used.
Conclusions:
- The choice of income disparity index significantly impacts the interpretation of state-level BMI data.
- Using a national standard may obscure state-specific health realities compared to state-specific data.
- Findings underscore the need for careful selection of disparity metrics in public health research and policy.
More Related Videos
06:48Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
Published on: June 7, 2024
03:35Determining Gender-Based Differences in Retinal and Choroidal Thickness in Underweight Individuals via Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: December 1, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Obesity
Weighted Mean
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Bias in Epidemiological Studies