Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
The Safety of Iterative Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A High Volume Center
Eliahu Bekhor1,2, Jacquelyn Carr3, Margaret Hofstedt3
1Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA. elibekhor@gmail.com.
Introduction:
Offering iterative cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for recurrence of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) poses a surgical dilemma. Safety of this repeated operation in the short and long term has not been largely investigated.
Methods:
Patients with PC who underwent 377 CRS/HIPEC procedures between 2007 and 2018 at our institution were included from a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes for patients who had singular CRS/HIPEC were compared with those for patients who had repeated CRS/HIPEC.
Results:
Overall, there were 325 singular and 52 iterative CRS/HIPEC procedures performed during this time period. Age, sex, and ASA class were comparable between cohorts (p = NS). Optimal cytoreduction, mean operative time, mean length of hospital stay, 90-day major morbidity, and 90-day mortality were also similar. At a median follow-up of 24 months, there was no significant difference in recurrence rate (%, 60 vs 63, p = 0.76), disease-free survival (mean months, 19 vs 15, p = 0.30), and overall survival (mean months, 32 vs 27, p = 0.69). The iterative CRS/HIPEC group had significantly higher rates of major late complications than the singular CRS/HIPEC group (%, 18 vs 40, p < 0.01).
Conclusion:
Repeated CRS/HIPEC for PC has similar perioperative morbidity and mortality, as well as long-term oncological benefits, when compared with singular CRS/HIPEC. However, more than twice as many patients undergoing iterative CRS/HIPEC suffered from major late complications.
